Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGCX vs VMGMX
LMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs VMGMX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$14.72
Change+$0.10 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets710.14M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$123.25
Change+$0.37 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.91B
LMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a Hold and VMGMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 31.9B vs. LMGCX (710M). VMGMX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: VMGMX (0.64) vs LMGCX (0.00). LMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: LMGCX (27 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). LMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: LMGCX (1000) vs VMGMX (3000). VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. LMGCX (-0.47). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 33.45 vs. LMGCX (-24.16).
| LMGCX | VMGMX | LMGCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.07 | 2,443% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.07 | 2,714% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.397 | 2.563 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 710M | 31.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.64 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | 9.57 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.32 | 51.74 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.16 | 33.45 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.37 | 222.57 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers