Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGCX vs VMGMX
LMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs VMGMX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$15.86
Change+$0.26 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets639.79M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$126.21
Change+$1.13 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.45B
LMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a StrongBuy and VMGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 31.5B vs. LMGCX (640M). VMGMX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: VMGMX (0.63) vs LMGCX (0.00). LMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: LMGCX (27 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). LMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: LMGCX (1000) vs VMGMX (3000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.41 vs. VMGMX (28.59). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 71.12 vs. LMGCX (-14.96).
| LMGCX | VMGMX | LMGCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.07 | 2,443% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.07 | 2,714% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.446 | 15.568 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 640M | 31.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.63 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.41 | 28.59 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.85 | 59.96 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.96 | 71.12 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.48 | 178.39 | -8% |