Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGCX vs PMBPX
LMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs PMBPX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$15.86
Change+$0.26 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets639.79M
LMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a StrongBuy and PMBPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. LMGCX (640M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs LMGCX (0.00). LMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: LMGCX (27 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: PMBPX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.41 vs. PMBPX (13.61). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 56.25 vs. LMGCX (-14.96).
| LMGCX | PMBPX | LMGCX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.83 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.83 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.446 | 8.606 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 640M | 33.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.41 | 13.61 | 253% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.85 | 49.38 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.96 | 56.25 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.48 | 107.27 | -13% |