Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGCX vs PMBPX
LMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs PMBPX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$14.72
Change+$0.10 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets710.14M
LMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a Hold and PMBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 31.3B vs. LMGCX (710M). LMGCX (0.00) and PMBPX (0.00) have matching dividends . LMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: LMGCX (27 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: PMBPX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.47 vs. PMBPX (-2.01). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 22.03 vs. LMGCX (-24.16).
| LMGCX | PMBPX | LMGCX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.83 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.83 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.397 | 2.907 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 710M | 31.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | -2.01 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.32 | 32.15 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.16 | 22.03 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.37 | 131.71 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers