Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGCX vs PEMGX
LMGCX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs PEMGX
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C
Price$17.01
Change+$0.34 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets690.58M
LMGCX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. PEMGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a StrongBuy and PEMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. LMGCX (691M). LMGCX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LMGCX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LMGCX (27 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). LMGCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). LMGCX (1000) and PEMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.50 vs. PEMGX (9.01). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.31 vs. LMGCX (-13.49).
| LMGCX | PEMGX | LMGCX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.91 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.91 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.086 | 6.969 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 691M | 33B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.50 | 9.01 | 438% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.78 | 45.42 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.49 | 46.31 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.18 | 108.18 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement