Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCRX vs MVCAX
LMCRX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCRX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R3
Price$33.46
Change+$0.10 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
LMCRX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCRX vs. MVCAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCRX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. LMCRX (1.13B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCRX: MVCAX (0.84) vs LMCRX (0.30). LMCRX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCRX (17 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). LMCRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). LMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: LMCRX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.36 vs. LMCRX (-3.67). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.66 vs. LMCRX (40.46).
| LMCRX | MVCAX | LMCRX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.99 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.00 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.420 | 5.346 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 17.3B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.84 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.67 | -1.36 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.65 | 13.12 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.46 | 52.66 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.51 | 76.55 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement