Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCRX vs MVCAX
LMCRX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCRX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R3
Price$34.94
Change+$0.25 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
LMCRX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCRX vs. MVCAX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCRX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.2B vs. LMCRX (1.14B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCRX: MVCAX (0.83) vs LMCRX (0.29). LMCRX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCRX (18 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). LMCRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). LMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: LMCRX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.12 vs. LMCRX (-7.94). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.20 vs. LMCRX (25.70).
| LMCRX | MVCAX | LMCRX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.99 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.00 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.862 | 0.196 | 2,486% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 17.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.83 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.94 | -4.12 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.97 | 12.85 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.70 | 27.20 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.01 | 72.41 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement