Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCRX vs MVCAX
LMCRX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCRX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R3
Price$32.45
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
LMCRX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCRX vs. MVCAX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCRX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. LMCRX (1.1B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCRX: MVCAX (0.86) vs LMCRX (0.31). LMCRX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCRX (17 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). LMCRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). LMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: LMCRX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.87 vs. LMCRX (-7.64). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.43 vs. LMCRX (34.67).
| LMCRX | MVCAX | LMCRX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.99 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.00 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.611 | 3.162 | -83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 17.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.86 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.64 | -3.87 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.18 | 8.25 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.67 | 49.43 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.41 | 71.66 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement