Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCQX vs VEVYX
LMCQX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCQX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$34.09
Change+$0.82 (+2.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$48.07
Change+$1.75 (+3.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.2B
LMCQX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCQX vs. VEVYX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCQX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. LMCQX (1.14B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCQX: VEVYX (0.89) vs LMCQX (0.01). LMCQX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCQX (18 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). LMCQX (1.37) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (45.00). LMCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCQX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). VEVYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. LMCQX (0.02). VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 20.54 vs. LMCQX (16.34).
| LMCQX | VEVYX | LMCQX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.66 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.66 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.178 | 6.775 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 16.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.89 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | 2.79 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.55 | 3.61 | 403% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.34 | 20.54 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.49 | 88.67 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers