Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCQX vs VEVYX
LMCQX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCQX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$33.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$45.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.82B
LMCQX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCQX vs. VEVYX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCQX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. LMCQX (1.13B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCQX: VEVYX (1.02) vs LMCQX (0.23). LMCQX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCQX (18 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). LMCQX (1.37) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (45.00). LMCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCQX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). LMCQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.03 vs. VEVYX (-1.16). VEVYX (20.22) and LMCQX (19.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LMCQX | VEVYX | LMCQX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.66 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.66 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.331 | 0.028 | 4,803% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 15.8B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 1.02 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.03 | -1.16 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.54 | 4.96 | 434% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.95 | 20.22 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.90 | 65.42 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers