Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCPX vs VMVAX
LMCPX vs VMVAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCPX vs VMVAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$33.23
Change+$0.70 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Admiral
Price$96.91
Change+$7.30 (+8.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.17B
LMCPX vs VMVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCPX vs. VMVAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCPX is a Buy and VMVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMVAX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. LMCPX (1.15B). VMVAX pays higher dividends than LMCPX: VMVAX (2.01) vs LMCPX (0.25). LMCPX was incepted earlier than VMVAX: LMCPX (28 years) vs VMVAX (14 years). LMCPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than VMVAX (0.07). LMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VMVAX (19.00). LMCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMVAX: LMCPX (0) vs VMVAX (3000). VMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.53 vs. LMCPX (-0.00). VMVAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.71 vs. LMCPX (16.42).
| LMCPX | VMVAX | LMCPX / VMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.07 | 1,743% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.07 | 1,743% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.199 | 5.509 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 33.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 2.01 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.00 | 13.53 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.67 | 29.37 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.42 | 52.71 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.54 | 142.89 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement