Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCPX vs MVCAX
LMCPX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCPX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$32.47
Change+$0.33 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
LMCPX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCPX vs. MVCAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCPX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. LMCPX (1.13B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCPX: MVCAX (0.84) vs LMCPX (0.37). LMCPX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCPX (28 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). LMCPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). LMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: LMCPX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.51 vs. LMCPX (-8.51). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.63 vs. LMCPX (45.95).
| LMCPX | MVCAX | LMCPX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.99 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.00 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.526 | 4.498 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 17.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.84 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.51 | -6.51 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.91 | 27.54 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.95 | 56.63 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.15 | 84.56 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement