Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCPX vs MVCAX
LMCPX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCPX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$33.31
Change+$0.42 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
LMCPX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCPX vs. MVCAX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCPX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. LMCPX (1.13B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCPX: MVCAX (0.83) vs LMCPX (0.35). LMCPX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCPX (28 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). LMCPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). LMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: LMCPX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.54 vs. LMCPX (-11.56). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.80 vs. LMCPX (21.28).
| LMCPX | MVCAX | LMCPX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.99 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.00 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.127 | 5.965 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 17B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.83 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.56 | -9.54 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.80 | 11.01 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.28 | 32.80 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.43 | 73.95 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers