Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCHX vs MVCAX
LMCHX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCHX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R6
Price$34.27
Change-$0.40 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
LMCHX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCHX vs. MVCAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCHX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. LMCHX (1.13B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCHX: MVCAX (0.85) vs LMCHX (0.78). LMCHX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCHX (10 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than LMCHX (0.67). LMCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: LMCHX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.14 vs. LMCHX (-10.43). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.31 vs. LMCHX (31.83).
| LMCHX | MVCAX | LMCHX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.99 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.00 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.970 | 5.117 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 16.8B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.85 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.43 | -9.14 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.51 | 12.45 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.83 | 38.31 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.30 | 76.71 | 67% |