Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCFX vs VEVYX
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCFX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$34.58
Change+$0.44 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$46.94
Change+$0.45 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.21B
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCFX vs. VEVYX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCFX is a Hold and VEVYX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. LMCFX (1.13B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: VEVYX (1.02) vs LMCFX (0.66). LMCFX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCFX (18 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). LMCFX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCFX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). LMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.54 vs. VEVYX (-12.93). LMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.11 vs. VEVYX (20.07).
| LMCFX | VEVYX | LMCFX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.66 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.66 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.726 | 2.309 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 16.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.02 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.54 | -12.93 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.72 | -2.22 | -574% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.11 | 20.07 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.45 | 47.79 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement