Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCFX vs VEVYX
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCFX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$33.98
Change-$0.15 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$46.75
Change-$0.29 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.73B
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCFX vs. VEVYX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCFX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.7B vs. LMCFX (1.13B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: VEVYX (1.09) vs LMCFX (0.75). LMCFX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCFX (18 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). LMCFX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCFX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). LMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.07 vs. VEVYX (-4.06). LMCFX (44.32) and VEVYX (43.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LMCFX | VEVYX | LMCFX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.247 | 2.971 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 17.7B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.09 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.07 | -4.06 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.29 | 7.34 | 276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | 43.23 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.60 | 52.03 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers