Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCFX vs VEVYX
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCFX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$33.65
Change+$0.22 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$46.65
Change+$0.25 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.76B
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCFX vs. VEVYX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCFX is a StrongBuy and VEVYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.8B vs. LMCFX (1.12B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: VEVYX (1.09) vs LMCFX (0.75). LMCFX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCFX (18 years) vs VEVYX (12 years). LMCFX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCFX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). LMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.28 vs. VEVYX (-1.65). VEVYX (48.38) and LMCFX (46.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LMCFX | VEVYX | LMCFX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | 2.118 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 17.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.09 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.28 | -1.65 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.26 | 9.30 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.42 | 48.38 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.17 | 50.51 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers