Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCFX vs VEVYX
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCFX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$34.44
Change+$0.69 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$48.07
Change+$1.75 (+3.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.2B
LMCFX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCFX vs. VEVYX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCFX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. LMCFX (1.15B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: VEVYX (0.89) vs LMCFX (0.56). LMCFX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCFX (18 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). LMCFX (0.87) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (45.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCFX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). VEVYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. LMCFX (0.60). VEVYX (20.54) and LMCFX (19.58) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LMCFX | VEVYX | LMCFX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.66 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.66 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.237 | 6.775 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 16.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.89 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.60 | 2.79 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.52 | 3.61 | 458% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.58 | 20.54 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.16 | 88.67 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement