Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCFX vs MVCAX
LMCFX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCFX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$34.44
Change+$0.69 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
LMCFX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCFX vs. MVCAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCFX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. LMCFX (1.15B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: MVCAX (1.20) vs LMCFX (0.56). LMCFX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCFX (18 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than LMCFX (0.87). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. MVCAX (24.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: LMCFX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.90 vs. LMCFX (0.60). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.95 vs. LMCFX (19.58).
| LMCFX | MVCAX | LMCFX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.99 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.00 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.237 | 4.789 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 17.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.20 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.60 | 1.90 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.52 | 11.13 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.58 | 23.95 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.16 | 99.09 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement