Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCCX vs VMVAX
LMCCX vs VMVAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCCX vs VMVAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$31.05
Change+$0.64 (+2.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Admiral
Price$96.91
Change+$7.30 (+8.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.17B
LMCCX vs VMVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCCX vs. VMVAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCCX is a Buy and VMVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMVAX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. LMCCX (1.15B). VMVAX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: VMVAX (2.01) vs LMCCX (0.00). LMCCX was incepted earlier than VMVAX: LMCCX (29 years) vs VMVAX (14 years). LMCCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than VMVAX (0.07). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VMVAX (19.00). LMCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMVAX: LMCCX (1000) vs VMVAX (3000). VMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.53 vs. LMCCX (-0.99). VMVAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.71 vs. LMCCX (11.26).
| LMCCX | VMVAX | LMCCX / VMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.07 | 2,529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.07 | 2,529% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.156 | 5.509 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 33.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.99 | 13.53 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.65 | 29.37 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.26 | 52.71 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.63 | 142.89 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement