Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCCX vs VEVYX
LMCCX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCCX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$31.05
Change+$0.64 (+2.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$48.07
Change+$1.75 (+3.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.2B
LMCCX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCCX vs. VEVYX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCCX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. LMCCX (1.15B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: VEVYX (0.89) vs LMCCX (0.00). LMCCX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCCX (29 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). LMCCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (45.00). LMCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCCX (1000) vs VEVYX (1000000). VEVYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. LMCCX (-0.99). VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 20.54 vs. LMCCX (11.26).
| LMCCX | VEVYX | LMCCX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.66 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.66 | 268% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.156 | 6.775 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 16.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.89 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.99 | 2.79 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.65 | 3.61 | 323% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.26 | 20.54 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.63 | 88.67 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement