Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCCX vs VEVYX
LMCCX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCCX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$31.12
Change+$0.39 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$46.94
Change+$0.45 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16B
LMCCX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCCX vs. VEVYX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCCX is a Hold and VEVYX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. LMCCX (1.13B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: VEVYX (1.02) vs LMCCX (0.00). LMCCX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCCX (29 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). LMCCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). LMCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCCX (1000) vs VEVYX (1000000). VEVYX (-12.93) and LMCCX (-13.41) have marching annual gain over last year. VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 20.07 vs. LMCCX (17.82).
| LMCCX | VEVYX | LMCCX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.66 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.66 | 268% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.446 | 2.309 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 16B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.41 | -12.93 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.78 | -2.22 | -351% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.82 | 20.07 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.67 | 47.79 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers