Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCCX vs MVCAX
LMCCX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCCX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$30.53
Change-$0.36 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
LMCCX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCCX vs. MVCAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCCX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. LMCCX (1.13B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: MVCAX (0.85) vs LMCCX (0.00). LMCCX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCCX (29 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). LMCCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCCX (1000) and MVCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.14 vs. LMCCX (-12.57). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.31 vs. LMCCX (22.84).
| LMCCX | MVCAX | LMCCX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.99 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.00 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.545 | 5.117 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 16.8B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.85 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.57 | -9.14 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.62 | 12.45 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.84 | 38.31 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.42 | 76.71 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement