LMB
Price
$113.90
Change
-$1.23 (-1.07%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.32B
80 days until earnings call
TT
Price
$423.43
Change
-$5.10 (-1.19%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
94.22B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LMB vs TT

Header iconLMB vs TT Comparison
Open Charts LMB vs TTBanner chart's image
Limbach Holdings
Price$113.90
Change-$1.23 (-1.07%)
Volume$309.37K
Capitalization1.32B
Trane Technologies
Price$423.43
Change-$5.10 (-1.19%)
Volume$891.93K
Capitalization94.22B
LMB vs TT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LMB vs. TT commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMB is a Hold and TT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (LMB: $113.90 vs. TT: $423.43)
Brand notoriety: LMB and TT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LMB: 132% vs. TT: 69%
Market capitalization -- LMB: $1.32B vs. TT: $94.22B
LMB [@Building Products] is valued at $1.32B. TT’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $94.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $94.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LMB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LMB and TT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LMB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LMB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LMB is a better buy in the short-term than TT.

Price Growth

LMB (@Building Products) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while TT (@Building Products) price change was -1.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

LMB is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

TT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+1.88% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TT($94.2B) has a higher market cap than LMB($1.32B). LMB has higher P/E ratio than TT: LMB (39.01) vs TT (33.39). LMB YTD gains are higher at: 33.154 vs. TT (15.210). TT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.19B vs. LMB (55.9M). TT has more cash in the bank: 774M vs. LMB (38.1M). LMB has less debt than TT: LMB (48M) vs TT (4.62B). TT has higher revenues than LMB: TT (20.8B) vs LMB (533M).
LMBTTLMB / TT
Capitalization1.32B94.2B1%
EBITDA55.9M4.19B1%
Gain YTD33.15415.210218%
P/E Ratio39.0133.39117%
Revenue533M20.8B3%
Total Cash38.1M774M5%
Total Debt48M4.62B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LMB vs TT: Fundamental Ratings
LMB
TT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5868
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
128
SMR RATING
1..100
4125
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1753
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LMB's Valuation (86) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as TT (89) in the null industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew similarly to TT’s over the last 12 months.

TT's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as LMB (12) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to LMB’s over the last 12 months.

TT's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as LMB (41) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to LMB’s over the last 12 months.

TT's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as LMB (51) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to LMB’s over the last 12 months.

LMB's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Miscellaneous industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TT (53) in the null industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than TT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LMBTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETHFI.X1.2112920.034914
+2.97%
ether.fi cryptocurrency
IHAK50.880.34
+0.66%
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF
KDRN23.20N/A
N/A
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF
EMBD23.57-0.01
-0.04%
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
VPC20.34-0.04
-0.17%
Virtus Private Credit ETF

LMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMB has been loosely correlated with SPXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMB jumps, then SPXC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMB
1D Price
Change %
LMB100%
-1.07%
SPXC - LMB
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
JCI - LMB
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
TT - LMB
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
AAON - LMB
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.28%
AWI - LMB
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
More

TT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TT has been loosely correlated with JCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TT jumps, then JCI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TT
1D Price
Change %
TT100%
-1.19%
JCI - TT
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
CARR - TT
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
LII - TT
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
SPXC - TT
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
AAON - TT
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.28%
More