LMB
Price
$72.27
Change
-$6.35 (-8.08%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
913.87M
125 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TT
Price
$415.03
Change
-$6.72 (-1.59%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
93.52B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LMB vs TT

Header iconLMB vs TT Comparison
Open Charts LMB vs TTBanner chart's image
Limbach Holdings
Price$72.27
Change-$6.35 (-8.08%)
Volume$1.74K
Capitalization913.87M
Trane Technologies
Price$415.03
Change-$6.72 (-1.59%)
Volume$8.83K
Capitalization93.52B
LMB vs TT Comparison Chart in %
LMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LMB vs. TT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMB is a Hold and TT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LMB: $78.62 vs. TT: $421.75)
Brand notoriety: LMB and TT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LMB: 121% vs. TT: 103%
Market capitalization -- LMB: $839.46M vs. TT: $91.99B
LMB [@Building Products] is valued at $839.46M. TT’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $91.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $91.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LMB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LMB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TT is a better buy in the long-term than LMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LMB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LMB is a better buy in the short-term than TT.

Price Growth

LMB (@Building Products) experienced а -6.40% price change this week, while TT (@Building Products) price change was -3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

LMB is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.

TT is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-1.67% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TT($93.5B) has a higher market cap than LMB($914M). TT has higher P/E ratio than LMB: TT (32.27) vs LMB (25.94). TT YTD gains are higher at: 15.014 vs. LMB (-8.090). TT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.19B vs. LMB (59.5M). TT has more cash in the bank: 774M vs. LMB (38.9M). LMB has less debt than TT: LMB (54.4M) vs TT (4.62B). TT has higher revenues than LMB: TT (20.8B) vs LMB (553M).
LMBTTLMB / TT
Capitalization914M93.5B1%
EBITDA59.5M4.19B1%
Gain YTD-8.09015.014-54%
P/E Ratio25.9432.2780%
Revenue553M20.8B3%
Total Cash38.9M774M5%
Total Debt54.4M4.62B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LMB vs TT: Fundamental Ratings
LMB
TT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5278
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4711
SMR RATING
1..100
4024
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8862
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LMB's Valuation (86) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as TT (88) in the null industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew similarly to TT’s over the last 12 months.

TT's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMB (47) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that TT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMB’s over the last 12 months.

TT's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as LMB (40) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to LMB’s over the last 12 months.

TT's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as LMB (87) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to LMB’s over the last 12 months.

TT's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as LMB (88) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that TT’s stock grew similarly to LMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LMBTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSQO20.700.05
+0.24%
Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF
FAX15.400.01
+0.06%
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund
HYHG64.080.03
+0.04%
ProShares High Yield—Interest Rate Hdgd
IBIH26.38-0.01
-0.04%
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term Tips ETF
STIP102.90-0.14
-0.14%
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF

LMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMB has been loosely correlated with TT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMB jumps, then TT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMB
1D Price
Change %
LMB100%
+2.04%
TT - LMB
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
TTEK - LMB
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
SPXC - LMB
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
JCI - LMB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
CODYY - LMB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
More

TT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TT has been closely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TT jumps, then IR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TT
1D Price
Change %
TT100%
+0.03%
IR - TT
77%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
JCI - TT
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
CARR - TT
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
LII - TT
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
AAON - TT
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
More