Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMASX vs NAESX
LMASX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMASX vs NAESX
ClearBridge Small Cap C
Price$34.34
Change+$0.24 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets707.32M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
LMASX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMASX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMASX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. LMASX (707M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMASX: NAESX (1.28) vs LMASX (0.40). LMASX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMASX (40 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LMASX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). LMASX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LMASX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. LMASX (1.92). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.32 vs. LMASX (19.45).
| LMASX | NAESX | LMASX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.17 | 1,088% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.17 | 1,094% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.914 | 1.432 | -134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 707M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.28 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.92 | 12.22 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.42 | 37.83 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.45 | 69.32 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.08 | 108.83 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement