It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LLY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePFE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LLY (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +3.38% price change this week, while PFE (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -0.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.79%.
LLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
PFE is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| LLY | PFE | LLY / PFE | |
| Capitalization | 964B | 142B | 679% |
| EBITDA | 25.3B | 18.5B | 137% |
| Gain YTD | 40.340 | 1.173 | 3,440% |
| P/E Ratio | 52.77 | 14.55 | 363% |
| Revenue | 59.4B | 62.8B | 95% |
| Total Cash | 9.91B | 15B | 66% |
| Total Debt | 42.5B | 60.8B | 70% |
LLY | PFE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 7 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFE's Valuation (34) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LLY (77). This means that PFE’s stock grew somewhat faster than LLY’s over the last 12 months.
LLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for PFE (100). This means that LLY’s stock grew significantly faster than PFE’s over the last 12 months.
LLY's SMR Rating (13) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFE (68). This means that LLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFE’s over the last 12 months.
LLY's Price Growth Rating (9) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFE (54). This means that LLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFE’s over the last 12 months.
LLY's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as PFE (96). This means that LLY’s stock grew similarly to PFE’s over the last 12 months.
| LLY | PFE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 52% | 9 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 55% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LLY has been loosely correlated with AZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LLY jumps, then AZN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFE has been closely correlated with BIIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFE jumps, then BIIB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFE | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| BIIB - PFE | 69% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| BMY - PFE | 68% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| AMGN - PFE | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| ABBV - PFE | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| NVS - PFE | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
More | ||||