Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LLGLX vs TEDSX
LLGLX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts LLGLX vs TEDSX
Longleaf Partners Global
Price$14.65
Change-$0.08 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.38M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.44
Change-$0.36 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.43B
LLGLX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LLGLX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LLGLX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.43B vs. LLGLX (257M). LLGLX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: LLGLX (2.88) vs TEDSX (0.75). LLGLX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: LLGLX (13 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than LLGLX (1.29). LLGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLGLX: TEDSX (1000) vs LLGLX (10000). LLGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.86 vs. TEDSX (5.08). TEDSX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. LLGLX (20.43).
| LLGLX | TEDSX | LLGLX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.96 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.96 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.015 | 16.851 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 257M | 9.43B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 0.75 | 382% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 5.08 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.84 | 17.27 | 289% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.43 | 27.14 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.88 | 10.70 | 541% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement