LLDTF
Price
$1.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
90.77B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LYG
Price
$6.16
Change
-$0.09 (-1.44%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
90.77B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LLDTF vs LYG

Header iconLLDTF vs LYG Comparison
Open Charts LLDTF vs LYGBanner chart's image
Lloyds Banking Group
Price$1.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization90.77B
Lloyds Banking Group
Price$6.16
Change-$0.09 (-1.44%)
Volume$89.26K
Capitalization90.77B
LLDTF vs LYG Comparison Chart in %
LLDTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LYG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LLDTF vs. LYG commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LLDTF is a Buy and LYG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (LLDTF: $1.40 vs. LYG: $6.16)
Brand notoriety: LLDTF and LYG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LLDTF: 2% vs. LYG: 317%
Market capitalization -- LLDTF: $90.77B vs. LYG: $90.77B
LLDTF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $90.77B. LYG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $90.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LLDTF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLYG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LLDTF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LYG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LLDTF and LYG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LLDTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LLDTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LYG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LLDTF is a better buy in the short-term than LYG.

Price Growth

LLDTF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.11% price change this week, while LYG (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYG is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LLDTF($90.8B) and LYG($90.8B) have the same market capitalization . LYG has higher P/E ratio than LLDTF: LYG (16.30) vs LLDTF (14.81). LYG YTD gains are higher at: 17.925 vs. LLDTF (6.061). LLDTF (88.3B) and LYG (88.3B) have identical debt. LLDTF (19.4B) and LYG (19.4B) have equivalent revenues.
LLDTFLYGLLDTF / LYG
Capitalization90.8B90.8B100%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.06117.92534%
P/E Ratio14.8116.3091%
Revenue19.4B19.4B100%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt88.3B88.3B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LLDTF vs LYG: Fundamental Ratings
LLDTF
LYG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8427
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
144
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1210
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LLDTF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as LYG (76) in the Major Banks industry. This means that LLDTF’s stock grew similarly to LYG’s over the last 12 months.

LYG's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LLDTF (14) in the null industry. This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to LLDTF’s over the last 12 months.

LYG's SMR Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LLDTF (5) in the null industry. This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to LLDTF’s over the last 12 months.

LYG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LLDTF (40) in the null industry. This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to LLDTF’s over the last 12 months.

LYG's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LLDTF (12) in the null industry. This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to LLDTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LLDTFLYG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LLDTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LYG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYHG64.910.17
+0.26%
ProShares High Yield—Interest Rate Hdgd
SPSM49.99-0.03
-0.06%
State Street SPDR Port S&P 600 Sm CpETF
XNOV38.09-0.13
-0.33%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Nov
DBEU49.80-0.37
-0.74%
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity ETF
QBIG37.40-0.65
-1.72%
Invesco Top QQQ ETF

LLDTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LLDTF and LYG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LLDTF and LYG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LLDTF
1D Price
Change %
LLDTF100%
N/A
LYG - LLDTF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
KBCSF - LLDTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OVCHY - LLDTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
LRCDF - LLDTF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFGP - LLDTF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More

LYG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYG has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYG jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYG
1D Price
Change %
LYG100%
+1.30%
NWG - LYG
70%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
SBNY - LYG
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DB - LYG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
MFG - LYG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
BSAC - LYG
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
More