LKNCY
Price
$34.70
Change
-$0.32 (-0.91%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
9.93B
MTYFF
Price
$30.53
Change
+$0.06 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
690.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LKNCY vs MTYFF

Header iconLKNCY vs MTYFF Comparison
Open Charts LKNCY vs MTYFFBanner chart's image
Luckin Coffee
Price$34.70
Change-$0.32 (-0.91%)
Volume$1.45M
Capitalization9.93B
MTY Food Group
Price$30.53
Change+$0.06 (+0.20%)
Volume$9.21K
Capitalization690.14M
LKNCY vs MTYFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LKNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LKNCY vs. MTYFF commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKNCY is a Hold and MTYFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (LKNCY: $31.65 vs. MTYFF: $31.08)
Brand notoriety: LKNCY and MTYFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LKNCY: 39% vs. MTYFF: 27%
Market capitalization -- LKNCY: $9.93B vs. MTYFF: $690.14M
LKNCY [@Restaurants] is valued at $9.93B. MTYFF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $690.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $220.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LKNCY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTYFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LKNCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTYFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKNCY is a better buy in the long-term than MTYFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LKNCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LKNCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

LKNCY (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.03% price change this week, while MTYFF (@Restaurants) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.86% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKNCY($9.93B) has a higher market cap than MTYFF($690M). MTYFF has higher P/E ratio than LKNCY: MTYFF (113.18) vs LKNCY (22.85). LKNCY YTD gains are higher at: 23.296 vs. MTYFF (-5.388). LKNCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.04B vs. MTYFF (144M). LKNCY has more cash in the bank: 4.56B vs. MTYFF (68.8M). MTYFF has less debt than LKNCY: MTYFF (1.22B) vs LKNCY (5.81B). LKNCY has higher revenues than MTYFF: LKNCY (31.9B) vs MTYFF (1.17B).
LKNCYMTYFFLKNCY / MTYFF
Capitalization9.93B690M1,440%
EBITDA4.04B144M2,807%
Gain YTD23.296-5.388-432%
P/E Ratio22.85113.1820%
Revenue31.9B1.17B2,736%
Total Cash4.56B68.8M6,624%
Total Debt5.81B1.22B476%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LKNCY vs MTYFF: Fundamental Ratings
LKNCY
MTYFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5888
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2861
SMR RATING
1..100
3889
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
162
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTYFF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as LKNCY (57). This means that MTYFF’s stock grew similarly to LKNCY’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTYFF (61). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTYFF (89). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MTYFF (56). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew similarly to MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

MTYFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as LKNCY (16). This means that MTYFF’s stock grew similarly to LKNCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LKNCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LKNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

LKNCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKNCY and YUMC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKNCY and YUMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKNCY
1D Price
Change %
LKNCY100%
-3.36%
YUMC - LKNCY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
HDALF - LKNCY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTYFF - LKNCY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGGSF - LKNCY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZRIF - LKNCY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MTYFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTYFF and RICK have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTYFF and RICK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTYFF
1D Price
Change %
MTYFF100%
N/A
RICK - MTYFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
WEN - MTYFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
YUMC - MTYFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
PBPB - MTYFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
KRUS - MTYFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
More