LKNCY
Price
$37.90
Change
+$1.69 (+4.67%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.75B
55 days until earnings call
MTYFF
Price
$27.70
Change
-$0.24 (-0.86%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
634.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LKNCY vs MTYFF

Header iconLKNCY vs MTYFF Comparison
Open Charts LKNCY vs MTYFFBanner chart's image
Luckin Coffee
Price$37.90
Change+$1.69 (+4.67%)
Volume$1.31M
Capitalization10.75B
MTY Food Group
Price$27.70
Change-$0.24 (-0.86%)
Volume$3.54K
Capitalization634.79M
LKNCY vs MTYFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LKNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTYFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LKNCY vs. MTYFF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKNCY is a StrongBuy and MTYFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LKNCY: $37.90 vs. MTYFF: $27.70)
Brand notoriety: LKNCY and MTYFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LKNCY: 66% vs. MTYFF: 88%
Market capitalization -- LKNCY: $10.75B vs. MTYFF: $634.79M
LKNCY [@Restaurants] is valued at $10.75B. MTYFF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $634.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $225.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LKNCY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTYFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LKNCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTYFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKNCY is a better buy in the long-term than MTYFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LKNCY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTYFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LKNCY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MTYFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LKNCY is a better buy in the short-term than MTYFF.

Price Growth

LKNCY (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.43% price change this week, while MTYFF (@Restaurants) price change was -0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

LKNCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.54% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKNCY($10.8B) has a higher market cap than MTYFF($635M). MTYFF (22.14) and LKNCY (22.08) have similar P/E ratio . LKNCY YTD gains are higher at: 47.643 vs. MTYFF (-15.677). LKNCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.56B vs. MTYFF (181M). LKNCY has more cash in the bank: 7.41B vs. MTYFF (47.2M). MTYFF has less debt than LKNCY: MTYFF (1.17B) vs LKNCY (6.17B). LKNCY has higher revenues than MTYFF: LKNCY (41B) vs MTYFF (1.17B).
LKNCYMTYFFLKNCY / MTYFF
Capitalization10.8B635M1,701%
EBITDA6.56B181M3,622%
Gain YTD47.643-15.677-304%
P/E Ratio22.0822.14100%
Revenue41B1.17B3,513%
Total Cash7.41B47.2M15,699%
Total Debt6.17B1.17B528%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LKNCY vs MTYFF: Fundamental Ratings
LKNCY
MTYFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7328
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2579
SMR RATING
1..100
2886
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
489
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5015

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTYFF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKNCY (64). This means that MTYFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKNCY’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTYFF (79). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTYFF (86). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MTYFF (62). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew similarly to MTYFF’s over the last 12 months.

MTYFF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKNCY (48). This means that MTYFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKNCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LKNCYMTYFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LKNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTYFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTHAX48.42-0.03
-0.06%
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq A
DDVIX14.43-0.01
-0.07%
Macquarie Value Inst
FBSAX39.52-0.10
-0.25%
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Adv
WCMNX13.17-0.04
-0.30%
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
NSCCX39.33-0.17
-0.43%
Nuveen Small-Cap Value Opps C

LKNCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKNCY and YUMC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKNCY and YUMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKNCY
1D Price
Change %
LKNCY100%
+4.67%
YUMC - LKNCY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
HDALF - LKNCY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTYFF - LKNCY
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
GGGSF - LKNCY
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
PZRIF - LKNCY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MTYFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTYFF and RICK have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTYFF and RICK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTYFF
1D Price
Change %
MTYFF100%
-0.86%
RICK - MTYFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
WEN - MTYFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
YUMC - MTYFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
PBPB - MTYFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
KRUS - MTYFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
More