LKHLY
Price
$12.88
Change
+$1.18 (+10.09%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
763M
OUKPF
Price
$10.56
Change
+$0.99 (+10.34%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
9.4B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LKHLY vs OUKPF

Header iconLKHLY vs OUKPF Comparison
Open Charts LKHLY vs OUKPFBanner chart's image
Lonking Holdings
Price$12.88
Change+$1.18 (+10.09%)
Volume$300
Capitalization763M
Metso OYJ
Price$10.56
Change+$0.99 (+10.34%)
Volume$656
Capitalization9.4B
LKHLY vs OUKPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LKHLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OUKPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LKHLY vs. OUKPF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKHLY is a Hold and OUKPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LKHLY: $12.88 vs. OUKPF: $10.56)
Brand notoriety: LKHLY and OUKPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LKHLY: 98% vs. OUKPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LKHLY: $763M vs. OUKPF: $9.4B
LKHLY [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $763M. OUKPF’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $9.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $181.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LKHLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOUKPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LKHLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OUKPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKHLY is a better buy in the long-term than OUKPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LKHLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OUKPF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LKHLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OUKPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OUKPF is a better buy in the short-term than LKHLY.

Price Growth

LKHLY (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OUKPF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+0.98% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OUKPF($9.41B) has a higher market cap than LKHLY($763M). OUKPF has higher P/E ratio than LKHLY: OUKPF (15.06) vs LKHLY (12.33). LKHLY YTD gains are higher at: 52.945 vs. OUKPF (17.913). OUKPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 964M vs. LKHLY (733M). LKHLY has higher revenues than OUKPF: LKHLY (11.2B) vs OUKPF (5.74B).
LKHLYOUKPFLKHLY / OUKPF
Capitalization763M9.41B8%
EBITDA733M964M76%
Gain YTD52.94517.913296%
P/E Ratio12.3315.0682%
Revenue11.2B5.74B195%
Total CashN/A365M-
Total DebtN/A1.21B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LKHLY vs OUKPF: Fundamental Ratings
LKHLY
OUKPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7938
SMR RATING
1..100
4161
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LKHLY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OUKPF (73). This means that LKHLY’s stock grew significantly faster than OUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

OUKPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKHLY (79). This means that OUKPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKHLY’s over the last 12 months.

LKHLY's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as OUKPF (61). This means that LKHLY’s stock grew similarly to OUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

LKHLY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as OUKPF (52). This means that LKHLY’s stock grew similarly to OUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

OUKPF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as LKHLY (80). This means that OUKPF’s stock grew similarly to LKHLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LKHLYOUKPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
36%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LKHLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OUKPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDERX12.120.19
+1.59%
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth R
SLPAX14.220.15
+1.07%
SEI Small Cap A (SIIT)
IOLZX27.760.22
+0.80%
ICON Equity Institutional
JMVQX36.670.14
+0.38%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value R4
MIOIX33.170.07
+0.21%
Morgan Stanley Inst International Opp I

LKHLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKHLY and CNH have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKHLY and CNH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKHLY
1D Price
Change %
LKHLY100%
N/A
CNH - LKHLY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
JEXYY - LKHLY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OUKPF - LKHLY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNNGF - LKHLY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KUBTF - LKHLY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OUKPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OUKPF and SNYYF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OUKPF and SNYYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OUKPF
1D Price
Change %
OUKPF100%
N/A
SNYYF - OUKPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNCRY - OUKPF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KMTUF - OUKPF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUODY - OUKPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKHLY - OUKPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More