LKFN
Price
$58.25
Change
-$0.08 (-0.14%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.49B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBWM
Price
$45.55
Change
-$0.12 (-0.26%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
740.19M
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LKFN vs MBWM

Header iconLKFN vs MBWM Comparison
Open Charts LKFN vs MBWMBanner chart's image
Lakeland Financial
Price$58.25
Change-$0.08 (-0.14%)
Volume$99.35K
Capitalization1.49B
Mercantile Bank
Price$45.55
Change-$0.12 (-0.26%)
Volume$63.53K
Capitalization740.19M
LKFN vs MBWM Comparison Chart in %
LKFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LKFN vs. MBWM commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKFN is a StrongBuy and MBWM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LKFN: $58.33 vs. MBWM: $45.67)
Brand notoriety: LKFN and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LKFN: 104% vs. MBWM: 96%
Market capitalization -- LKFN: $1.49B vs. MBWM: $740.19M
LKFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.49B. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $740.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LKFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LKFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than LKFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LKFN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LKFN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LKFN is a better buy in the short-term than MBWM.

Price Growth

LKFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.03% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

LKFN is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKFN($1.49B) has a higher market cap than MBWM($740M). LKFN has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: LKFN (15.37) vs MBWM (8.64). MBWM YTD gains are higher at: 5.192 vs. LKFN (-12.345). MBWM has more cash in the bank: 98.9M vs. LKFN (67.5M). LKFN has less debt than MBWM: LKFN (56.2M) vs MBWM (496M). LKFN has higher revenues than MBWM: LKFN (263M) vs MBWM (235M).
LKFNMBWMLKFN / MBWM
Capitalization1.49B740M201%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.3455.192-238%
P/E Ratio15.378.64178%
Revenue263M235M112%
Total Cash67.5M98.9M68%
Total Debt56.2M496M11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LKFN vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
LKFN
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
317
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6519
SMR RATING
1..100
2526
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7062
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (29) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKFN (75). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKFN (65). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

LKFN's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (26). This means that LKFN’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LKFN (74). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LKFN (70). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LKFNMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LKFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GABSX44.290.13
+0.29%
Gabelli Small Cap Growth AAA
VADDX80.040.19
+0.24%
Invesco Equally-Wtd S&P 500 Y
FDKFX16.70N/A
N/A
Fidelity International Discovery K6
VSPRX14.45-0.01
-0.07%
Voya Small Company Port R6
RYIIX175.73-0.75
-0.42%
Rydex Internet Inv

LKFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LKFN has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LKFN jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKFN
1D Price
Change %
LKFN100%
-0.70%
PEBO - LKFN
86%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
BY - LKFN
85%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
NWBI - LKFN
85%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
MBWM - LKFN
85%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
TRMK - LKFN
84%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
More

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
+0.07%
PEBO - MBWM
90%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
CTBI - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
HOPE - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
STBA - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
CCNE - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
More