LKFLF
Price
$2.26
Change
-$0.01 (-0.44%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.55B
MNNGF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
65.57M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LKFLF vs MNNGF

Header iconLKFLF vs MNNGF Comparison
Open Charts LKFLF vs MNNGFBanner chart's image
Luk Fook Holdings International
Price$2.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.44%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization1.55B
Affluent Partners Holdings
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$917
Capitalization65.57M
LKFLF vs MNNGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LKFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LKFLF vs. MNNGF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKFLF is a Hold and MNNGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LKFLF: $2.26 vs. MNNGF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: LKFLF and MNNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LKFLF: 127% vs. MNNGF: 152%
Market capitalization -- LKFLF: $1.55B vs. MNNGF: $65.57M
LKFLF [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $1.55B. MNNGF’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $65.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $466.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $55.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LKFLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNNGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LKFLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKFLF is a better buy in the long-term than MNNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LKFLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNNGF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LKFLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MNNGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNNGF is a better buy in the short-term than LKFLF.

Price Growth

LKFLF (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -0.33% price change this week, while MNNGF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+4.33% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKFLF($1.55B) has a higher market cap than MNNGF($65.6M). MNNGF has higher P/E ratio than LKFLF: MNNGF (31.15) vs LKFLF (9.04). MNNGF YTD gains are higher at: 60.000 vs. LKFLF (34.673). LKFLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.83B vs. MNNGF (13.5M). LKFLF has more cash in the bank: 3.55B vs. MNNGF (17.3M). MNNGF has less debt than LKFLF: MNNGF (5.23M) vs LKFLF (1.51B). LKFLF has higher revenues than MNNGF: LKFLF (8.86B) vs MNNGF (81.5M).
LKFLFMNNGFLKFLF / MNNGF
Capitalization1.55B65.6M2,358%
EBITDA1.83B13.5M13,563%
Gain YTD34.67360.00058%
P/E Ratio9.0431.1529%
Revenue8.86B81.5M10,872%
Total Cash3.55B17.3M20,497%
Total Debt1.51B5.23M28,858%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LKFLF vs MNNGF: Fundamental Ratings
LKFLF
MNNGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8451
SMR RATING
1..100
7097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LKFLF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNNGF (87). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MNNGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKFLF (84). This means that MNNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKFLF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MNNGF (97). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MNNGF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as LKFLF (49). This means that MNNGF’s stock grew similarly to LKFLF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNNGF (100). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LKFLFMNNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LKFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMIEX13.570.11
+0.82%
Multi-Manager Intl Eq Strats Instl
COSAX12.190.09
+0.74%
Columbia Overseas Core A
FOCKX22.650.16
+0.71%
Fidelity OTC K
HUSEX27.330.12
+0.44%
Huber Small Cap Value Instl
WOOPX18.110.03
+0.17%
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity I

LKFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKFLF and CHDRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKFLF and CHDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKFLF
1D Price
Change %
LKFLF100%
N/A
CHDRF - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
BCUCY - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
CJEWY - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWGAY - LKFLF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
SWGNF - LKFLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNNGF and REAL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNNGF and REAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNNGF
1D Price
Change %
MNNGF100%
N/A
REAL - MNNGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
LVMHF - MNNGF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
DCOHF - MNNGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNDZF - MNNGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKFLF - MNNGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More