LKFLF
Price
$3.40
Change
-$0.12 (-3.41%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.84B
MENEF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
29.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LKFLF vs MENEF

Header iconLKFLF vs MENEF Comparison
Open Charts LKFLF vs MENEFBanner chart's image
Luk Fook Holdings International
Price$3.40
Change-$0.12 (-3.41%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.84B
Mene
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization29.97M
LKFLF vs MENEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LKFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MENEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LKFLF vs. MENEF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKFLF is a Hold and MENEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (LKFLF: $3.40 vs. MENEF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: LKFLF and MENEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LKFLF: 3% vs. MENEF: 2%
Market capitalization -- LKFLF: $1.84B vs. MENEF: $29.97M
LKFLF [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $1.84B. MENEF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $29.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $295.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $40.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LKFLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMENEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LKFLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MENEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKFLF is a better buy in the long-term than MENEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LKFLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MENEF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LKFLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MENEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MENEF is a better buy in the short-term than LKFLF.

Price Growth

LKFLF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а -3.41% price change this week, while MENEF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was +0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was -2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (-2.50% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKFLF($1.84B) has a higher market cap than MENEF($30M). LKFLF YTD gains are higher at: 102.381 vs. MENEF (21.729).
LKFLFMENEFLKFLF / MENEF
Capitalization1.84B30M6,133%
EBITDAN/A358K-
Gain YTD102.38121.729471%
P/E Ratio14.14N/A-
RevenueN/A27.5M-
Total CashN/A7.17M-
Total DebtN/A631K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LKFLF vs MENEF: Fundamental Ratings
LKFLF
MENEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9973
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
7392
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3861
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
399
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a38

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LKFLF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MENEF (100). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew significantly faster than MENEF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MENEF (100). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MENEF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as MENEF (92). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to MENEF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MENEF (61). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to MENEF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MENEF (99). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew significantly faster than MENEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LKFLFMENEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LKFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MENEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSEGX57.360.62
+1.09%
Victory RS Small Cap Growth A
DVLRX64.450.67
+1.05%
Macquarie Small Cap Value R
AGFCX17.350.12
+0.70%
Alger Responsible Investing C
BSPSX778.764.59
+0.59%
iShares S&P 500 Index Service
CSHNX11.540.05
+0.44%
NYLI Cushing® MLP Premier Investor Class

LKFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKFLF and CHDRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKFLF and CHDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKFLF
1D Price
Change %
LKFLF100%
N/A
CHDRF - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCUCY - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
CJEWY - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWGAY - LKFLF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
SWGNF - LKFLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MENEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MENEF and HESAF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MENEF and HESAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MENEF
1D Price
Change %
MENEF100%
+1.90%
HESAF - MENEF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
PNDZF - MENEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKFLF - MENEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNNGF - MENEF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVMUY - MENEF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
More