Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LKBAX vs RLBAX
LKBAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts LKBAX vs RLBAX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.74
Change+$0.15 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
LKBAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LKBAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKBAX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. LKBAX (115M). LKBAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: LKBAX (1.32) vs RLBAX (1.15). LKBAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: LKBAX (28 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than LKBAX (1.02). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. LKBAX (15.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LKBAX: RLBAX (250) vs LKBAX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. LKBAX (6.42). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.40 vs. LKBAX (19.63).
| LKBAX | RLBAX | LKBAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.31 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.31 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.179 | 10.805 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115M | 259B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.15 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.42 | 9.12 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 37.15 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.63 | 35.40 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.17 | 67.71 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement