LITRF
Price
$3.72
Change
-$0.08 (-2.11%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
515.09M
TOEYF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
26.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LITRF vs TOEYF

Header iconLITRF vs TOEYF Comparison
Open Charts LITRF vs TOEYFBanner chart's image
Lithium Royalty
Price$3.72
Change-$0.08 (-2.11%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization515.09M
Toro Energy
Price$0.12
Change-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization26.13M
LITRF vs TOEYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LITRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LITRF vs. TOEYF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITRF is a Hold and TOEYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LITRF: $3.72 vs. TOEYF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: LITRF and TOEYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LITRF: 254% vs. TOEYF: 28%
Market capitalization -- LITRF: $515.09M vs. TOEYF: $26.13M
LITRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $515.09M. TOEYF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $26.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LITRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTOEYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LITRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TOEYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TOEYF is a better buy in the long-term than LITRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LITRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOEYF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LITRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TOEYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LITRF and TOEYF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LITRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while TOEYF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LITRF($515M) has a higher market cap than TOEYF($26.1M). LITRF YTD gains are higher at: -2.105 vs. TOEYF (-33.333). LITRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.64M vs. TOEYF (-11.68M). LITRF has more cash in the bank: 67.7M vs. TOEYF (3.65M).
LITRFTOEYFLITRF / TOEYF
Capitalization515M26.1M1,973%
EBITDA-2.64M-11.68M23%
Gain YTD-2.105-33.3336%
P/E Ratio54.64N/A-
Revenue1.92MN/A-
Total Cash67.7M3.65M1,853%
Total DebtN/A15M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TOEYF: Fundamental Ratings
TOEYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LITRFTOEYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LITRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLPTF0.09N/A
N/A
LIAONING PORT CO LTD.
SCGLF55.17N/A
N/A
Societe Generale
TCMFF0.35N/A
N/A
Telecom Argentina S.A.
CAMLF2.12N/A
N/A
Central Asia Metals Ltd, London
USGDF0.17N/A
-1.89%
American Pacific Mining Corp.

LITRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LITRF and TOEYF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LITRF and TOEYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITRF
1D Price
Change %
LITRF100%
N/A
TOEYF - LITRF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDNNY - LITRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
AFMJF - LITRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
CAPFF - LITRF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUCMF - LITRF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
More

TOEYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOEYF has been loosely correlated with GOCOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOEYF jumps, then GOCOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TOEYF
1D Price
Change %
TOEYF100%
N/A
GOCOF - TOEYF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CAXPF - TOEYF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MLGCF - TOEYF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LITRF - TOEYF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRBMF - TOEYF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More