Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs XLB
LITP vs XLB Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs XLB
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$7.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$28.28K
Net Assets20.25M
The Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$92.36
Change+$1.07 (+1.17%)
Volume$7.88M
Net Assets5.49B
LITP vs XLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. XLB commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Buy and XLB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLB has more net assets: 5.49B vs. LITP (20.2M). LITP has a higher annual dividend yield than XLB: LITP (17.290) vs XLB (10.854). LITP was incepted earlier than XLB: LITP (2 years) vs XLB (27 years). XLB (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). LITP has a higher turnover XLB (13.00) vs XLB (13.00).
| LITP | XLB | LITP / XLB | |
| Gain YTD | 17.290 | 10.854 | 159% |
| Net Assets | 20.2M | 5.49B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.08 | 813% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 13.00 | 377% |
| Yield | 7.64 | 1.94 | 393% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -5.24% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +5.90% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.69% | ||
More | ||||
XLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLB has been closely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLB jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y