Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs XLB
LITP vs XLB Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs XLB
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$5.67
Change-$0.05 (-0.87%)
Volume$7.93K
Net Assets12.68M
The Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$87.38
Change-$1.03 (-1.17%)
Volume$7.14M
Net Assets5.1B
LITP vs XLB Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. XLB commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and XLB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLB has more net assets: 5.1B vs. LITP (12.7M). XLB has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: XLB (4.346) vs LITP (-15.120). LITP was incepted earlier than XLB: LITP (2 years) vs XLB (27 years). XLB (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). LITP has a higher turnover XLB (13.00) vs XLB (13.00).
| LITP | XLB | LITP / XLB | |
| Gain YTD | -15.120 | 4.346 | -348% |
| Net Assets | 12.7M | 5.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.08 | 813% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 13.00 | 377% |
| Yield | 8.46 | 1.96 | 431% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 25 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -2.18% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||
XLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLB has been closely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLB jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y