31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SQM
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$9.69
Change-$0.37 (-3.68%)
Volume$56.19K
Net Assets28.35M
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$43.68
Change-$0.76 (-1.71%)
Volume$1.07M
Capitalization12.48B
LITP vs SQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SQM commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SQM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -3.68% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 68% Closely correlated | -8.41% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.12% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y