Intraday BUY SELL Signals
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SQM
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$11.84
Change-$0.17 (-1.42%)
Volume$402
Net Assets35.95M
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$63.03
Change-$1.34 (-2.08%)
Volume$62.88K
Capitalization18.26B
LITP vs SQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SQM commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SQM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VCLN | 26.84 | 0.47 | +1.78% |
| Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF | |||
| QQEW | 142.75 | 1.48 | +1.05% |
| First Trust NASDAQ-100 Equal Wtd ETF | |||
| PSMD | 31.98 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (January) ETF | |||
| MLDR | 49.85 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X Intermediate-Term Trsy Lddr ETF | |||
| CEFS | 22.57 | -0.15 | -0.66% |
| Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | |||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -0.79% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | -8.72% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| ALB - SQM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| OLN - SQM | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| HUN - SQM | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| SXYAY - SQM | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MEOH - SQM | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.67% | ||
More | ||||