Intraday BUY SELL Signals
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SQM
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$12.75
Change-$0.93 (-6.80%)
Volume$100
Net Assets59.4M
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$73.42
Change-$5.88 (-7.41%)
Volume$100
Capitalization22.65B
LITP vs SQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SQM commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SQM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 13 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UVXY | 36.72 | 2.09 | +6.04% |
| ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures | |||
| IBIL | 25.49 | 0.06 | +0.24% |
| ishares Ibonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF | |||
| GCV | 4.50 | N/A | N/A |
| Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund (The) | |||
| MIDE | 34.64 | N/A | N/A |
| Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scrd & Scrn ETF | |||
| MDYG | 97.07 | -0.04 | -0.04% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md Cp GrETF | |||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +5.07% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | +11.35% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | +6.75% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | +8.61% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y