2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SQM
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$8.07
Change+$0.21 (+2.67%)
Volume$47.69K
Net Assets20.74M
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$45.08
Change-$0.46 (-1.01%)
Volume$732.67K
Capitalization12.88B
LITP vs SQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SQM commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SQM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +2.63% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 76% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 75% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | +13.27% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| SLI - LITP | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y