Intraday BUY SELL Signals
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SQM
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$12.82
Change+$0.07 (+0.55%)
Volume$1.19K
Net Assets40.74M
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$71.64
Change+$0.74 (+1.04%)
Volume$5.13K
Capitalization20.25B
LITP vs SQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SQM commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a StrongBuy and SQM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 23 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| ALB - SQM | 78% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| OLN - SQM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| HUN - SQM | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| SXYAY - SQM | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| MEOH - SQM | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
More | ||||