8 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SQM
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$6.48
Change-$0.17 (-2.56%)
Volume$2.63K
Net Assets6.08M
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$39.67
Change-$0.14 (-0.35%)
Volume$684.09K
Capitalization13.99B
LITP vs SQM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SQM commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SQM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 84% | 18 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 14 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -2.56% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| SLI - LITP | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.45% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been loosely correlated with ALTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALTM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| ALTM - SQM | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| AVNT - SQM | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| WLK - SQM | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| ALB - SQM | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| MEOH - SQM | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.15% | ||
More | ||||