Intraday BUY SELL Signals
123 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs SGML
LITP vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SGML
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$11.84
Change-$0.17 (-1.42%)
Volume$18.41K
Net Assets35.4M
Sigma Lithium
Price$10.01
Change-$0.52 (-4.94%)
Volume$41.64K
Capitalization1.29B
LITP vs SGML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SGML commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SGML is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SGML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 23 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -0.79% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | -8.72% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
More | ||||
SGML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGML | 100% | -8.72% | ||
| LAR - SGML | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| PILBF - SGML | 45% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BHP - SGML | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| LAC - SGML | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| GLNCY - SGML | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||