27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs SGML
LITP vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SGML
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$9.69
Change-$0.37 (-3.68%)
Volume$56.19K
Net Assets28.35M
Sigma Lithium
Price$6.21
Change-$0.57 (-8.41%)
Volume$4.95M
Capitalization695.73M
LITP vs SGML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SGML commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SGML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SGML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -3.68% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 68% Closely correlated | -8.41% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.12% | ||
More | ||||
SGML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGML | 100% | -8.41% | ||
| LAR - SGML | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| BHP - SGML | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| VALE - SGML | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| PILBF - SGML | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| LAC - SGML | 43% Loosely correlated | -8.12% | ||
More | ||||