24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs PLL
LITP vs PLL Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs PLL
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$6.37
Change+$0.26 (+4.26%)
Volume$10.91K
Net Assets14.68M
Piedmont Lithium
Price$6.52
Change-$0.10 (-1.51%)
Volume$181.8K
Capitalization256.53M
LITP vs PLL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. PLL commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and PLL is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLL: Fundamental Ratings
PLL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | PLL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +4.26% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
More | ||||
PLL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLL | 100% | -1.51% | ||
| LAR - PLL | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| LAC - PLL | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| SGML - PLL | 49% Loosely correlated | +7.90% | ||
| SLI - PLL | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| SCCO - PLL | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||