4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs PLL
LITP vs PLL Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs PLL
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$7.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$28.28K
Net Assets20.25M
Piedmont Lithium
Price$8.14
Change-$0.45 (-5.24%)
Volume$384.69K
Capitalization256.53M
LITP vs PLL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. PLL commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Buy and PLL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLL: Fundamental Ratings
PLL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | PLL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -5.24% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +5.90% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.69% | ||
More | ||||
PLL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLL | 100% | -5.24% | ||
| LAC - PLL | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.69% | ||
| LAR - PLL | 55% Loosely correlated | +5.90% | ||
| SGML - PLL | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| SLI - PLL | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| SCCO - PLL | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
More | ||||