LITM
Price
$2.88
Change
-$0.14 (-4.64%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
51.97M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TMC
Price
$6.53
Change
-$0.59 (-8.29%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.69B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LITM vs TMC

Header iconLITM vs TMC Comparison
Open Charts LITM vs TMCBanner chart's image
Snow Lake Resources
Price$2.88
Change-$0.14 (-4.64%)
Volume$558.87K
Capitalization51.97M
TMC the metals
Price$6.53
Change-$0.59 (-8.29%)
Volume$11.02M
Capitalization2.69B
LITM vs TMC Comparison Chart in %
LITM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LITM vs. TMC commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITM is a Hold and TMC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (LITM: $2.88 vs. TMC: $6.53)
Brand notoriety: LITM and TMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LITM: 110% vs. TMC: 106%
Market capitalization -- LITM: $51.97M vs. TMC: $2.69B
LITM [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $51.97M. TMC’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LITM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LITM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LITM and TMC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LITM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LITM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TMC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LITM is a better buy in the short-term than TMC.

Price Growth

LITM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -23.81% price change this week, while TMC (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -22.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +77.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

TMC is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-6.50% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMC($2.69B) has a higher market cap than LITM($52M). TMC YTD gains are higher at: 15.397 vs. LITM (-4.000). LITM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.85M vs. TMC (-291.32M). LITM (0) and TMC (0) have equivalent revenues.
LITMTMCLITM / TMC
Capitalization52M2.69B2%
EBITDA-6.85M-291.32M2%
Gain YTD-4.00015.397-26%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total CashN/A116M-
Total DebtN/A2.48M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LITMTMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LITM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HKUOY15.48N/A
N/A
Hakuhodo Dy Holdings, Inc.
LAUCF10.09N/A
N/A
Laurentian Bank of Canada
CLILF2.46N/A
N/A
Capitaland Investment Ltd.
HRGN1.68N/A
N/A
Harvard Apparatus Regenerative Technology Inc.
AZLCZ1900.00-110.00
-5.47%
Aztec Land & Cattle Co., Ltd.

TMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMC has been loosely correlated with MP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMC jumps, then MP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMC
1D Price
Change %
TMC100%
+7.47%
MP - TMC
46%
Loosely correlated
+9.30%
USAR - TMC
42%
Loosely correlated
+17.46%
LITM - TMC
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
CRML - TMC
33%
Loosely correlated
+20.25%
IPX - TMC
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
More