Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs URNM
LIT vs URNM Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs URNM
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$71.95
Change+$12.83 (+21.70%)
Volume$567.3K
Net Assets1.67B
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
Price$76.45
Change+$14.97 (+24.35%)
Volume$1.37M
Net Assets2.58B
LIT vs URNM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. URNM commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and URNM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
URNM has more net assets: 2.58B vs. LIT (1.67B). URNM has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: URNM (39.279) vs LIT (10.931). LIT was incepted earlier than URNM: LIT (16 years) vs URNM (6 years). LIT (0.75) and URNM (0.75) have comparable expense ratios . LIT has a higher turnover URNM (18.00) vs URNM (18.00).
| LIT | URNM | LIT / URNM | |
| Gain YTD | 10.931 | 39.279 | 28% |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 2.58B | 65% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.75 | 100% |
| Turnover | 51.63 | 18.00 | 287% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 2.29 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +2.61% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 71% Closely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +11.35% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 50% Loosely correlated | +6.75% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||
URNM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that URNM and API have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that URNM and API's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To URNM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| URNM | 100% | +6.62% | ||
| API - URNM | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.35% | ||
| MGA - URNM | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| CVV - URNM | 18% Poorly correlated | -6.49% | ||
| LOT - URNM | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.52% | ||
| PEN - URNM | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||