Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs TINT
LIT vs TINT Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs TINT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$56.84
Change-$0.58 (-1.01%)
Volume$401.2K
Net Assets1.3B
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
Price$32.90
Change+$0.07 (+0.21%)
Volume$175
Net Assets1.64M
LIT vs TINT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. TINT commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and TINT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.3B vs. TINT (1.64M). LIT has a higher annual dividend yield than TINT: LIT (39.877) vs TINT (14.424). LIT was incepted earlier than TINT: LIT (15 years) vs TINT (4 years). TINT (0.58) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). TINT has a higher turnover LIT (22.87) vs LIT (22.87).
| LIT | TINT | LIT / TINT | |
| Gain YTD | 39.877 | 14.424 | 276% |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 1.64M | 79,015% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.58 | 129% |
| Turnover | 22.87 | 53.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 0.47 | 1.42 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | TINT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 17 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -1.01% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 61% Loosely correlated | -8.41% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||
TINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINT has been loosely correlated with MTRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TINT jumps, then MTRN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINT | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| MTRN - TINT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| RPM - TINT | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| SKYT - TINT | 53% Loosely correlated | -7.35% | ||
| ENTG - TINT | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| DD - TINT | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||