Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs TINT
LIT vs TINT Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs TINT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$67.10
Change+$0.44 (+0.66%)
Volume$176.46K
Net Assets1.5B
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
Price$33.05
Change-$0.34 (-1.02%)
Volume$1.53K
Net Assets1.68M
LIT vs TINT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. TINT commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a StrongBuy and TINT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.5B vs. TINT (1.68M). LIT has a higher annual dividend yield than TINT: LIT (65.125) vs TINT (14.979). LIT was incepted earlier than TINT: LIT (15 years) vs TINT (4 years). TINT (0.58) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). TINT has a higher turnover LIT (22.87) vs LIT (22.87).
| LIT | TINT | LIT / TINT | |
| Gain YTD | 65.125 | 14.979 | 435% |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 1.68M | 89,305% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.58 | 129% |
| Turnover | 22.87 | 53.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 1.41 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | TINT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||
TINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINT has been loosely correlated with MTRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TINT jumps, then MTRN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINT | 100% | N/A | ||
| MTRN - TINT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| RPM - TINT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| SKYT - TINT | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| ENTG - TINT | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| DD - TINT | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||