Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs TINT
LIT vs TINT Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs TINT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$71.95
Change+$12.83 (+21.70%)
Volume$567.3K
Net Assets1.67B
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
Price$36.56
Change+$3.99 (+12.25%)
Volume$502
Net Assets1.83M
LIT vs TINT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. TINT commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and TINT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.67B vs. TINT (1.83M). LIT (10.931) and TINT (10.762) have matching annual dividend yield . LIT was incepted earlier than TINT: LIT (16 years) vs TINT (4 years). TINT (0.58) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). TINT (53.00) and LIT (51.63) have matching turnover.
| LIT | TINT | LIT / TINT | |
| Gain YTD | 10.931 | 10.762 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 1.83M | 91,212% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.58 | 129% |
| Turnover | 51.63 | 53.00 | 97% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 1.18 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | TINT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +2.61% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 71% Closely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +11.35% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 50% Loosely correlated | +6.75% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||
TINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINT has been loosely correlated with MTRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TINT jumps, then MTRN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINT | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| MTRN - TINT | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.35% | ||
| RPM - TINT | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.25% | ||
| SKYT - TINT | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| ENTG - TINT | 52% Loosely correlated | -4.84% | ||
| DD - TINT | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
More | ||||