Intraday BUY SELL Signals
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs SQM
LIT vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs SQM
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$71.95
Change+$12.83 (+21.70%)
Volume$567.3K
Net Assets1.67B
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$79.30
Change+$36.08 (+83.48%)
Volume$1.68M
Capitalization21.49B
LIT vs SQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. SQM commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and SQM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 85% | 12 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | 100% | -2.07% | ||
| ALB - SQM | 79% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| OLN - SQM | 54% Loosely correlated | +6.54% | ||
| HUN - SQM | 50% Loosely correlated | +6.10% | ||
| SXYAY - SQM | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| MEOH - SQM | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||