10 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
LIT vs SQM
LIT vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs SQM
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$42.59
Change-$0.25 (-0.58%)
Volume$248.65K
Net Assets1.06B
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$39.67
Change-$0.14 (-0.35%)
Volume$684.09K
Capitalization13.99B
LIT vs SQM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. SQM commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Buy and SQM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 16 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 89% | 12 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 79% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 77% Closely correlated | +2.92% | ||
| TSLA - LIT | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| LCID - LIT | 38% Loosely correlated | +5.14% | ||
| PLL - LIT | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been loosely correlated with ALTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALTM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| ALTM - SQM | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AVNT - SQM | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| HUN - SQM | 47% Loosely correlated | +4.77% | ||
| WLK - SQM | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| MEOH - SQM | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
More | ||||