11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs SGML
LIT vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs SGML
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$46.00
Change+$0.66 (+1.46%)
Volume$164.46K
Net Assets1.05B
Sigma Lithium
Price$6.40
Change+$0.75 (+13.27%)
Volume$11.26M
Capitalization716.05M
LIT vs SGML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. SGML commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Buy and SGML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | SGML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +1.46% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 77% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 76% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +13.27% | ||
| LCID - LIT | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
More | ||||
SGML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGML | 100% | +13.27% | ||
| LAC - SGML | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| VALE - SGML | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| TECK - SGML | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| PLL - SGML | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| RIO - SGML | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||