Intraday BUY SELL Signals
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs SGML
LIT vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs SGML
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$63.70
Change+$1.39 (+2.23%)
Volume$900
Net Assets1.38B
Sigma Lithium
Price$5.75
Change-$0.08 (-1.37%)
Volume$1.54K
Capitalization659.11M
LIT vs SGML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. SGML commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and SGML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | SGML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +6.20% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
More | ||||
SGML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGML | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| LAR - SGML | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| BHP - SGML | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| LAC - SGML | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| PILBF - SGML | 45% Loosely correlated | +6.97% | ||
| GLNCY - SGML | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||