Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs PYZ
LIT vs PYZ Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs PYZ
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$56.84
Change-$0.58 (-1.01%)
Volume$401.2K
Net Assets1.27B
Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF
Price$108.60
Change-$3.01 (-2.70%)
Volume$1.12K
Net Assets56.53M
LIT vs PYZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. PYZ commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and PYZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.27B vs. PYZ (56.5M). LIT has a higher annual dividend yield than PYZ: LIT (39.877) vs PYZ (26.029). LIT was incepted earlier than PYZ: LIT (15 years) vs PYZ (19 years). PYZ (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). PYZ has a higher turnover LIT (22.87) vs LIT (22.87).
| LIT | PYZ | LIT / PYZ | |
| Gain YTD | 39.877 | 26.029 | 153% |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 56.5M | 2,255% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.60 | 125% |
| Turnover | 22.87 | 69.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.47 | 0.84 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | PYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -1.01% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 61% Loosely correlated | -8.41% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||
PYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYZ has been closely correlated with MTUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PYZ jumps, then MTUS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYZ | 100% | -2.69% | ||
| MTUS - PYZ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| ASIX - PYZ | 74% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| ZEUS - PYZ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| PPG - PYZ | 70% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| WY - PYZ | 66% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||