Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs PYZ
LIT vs PYZ Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs PYZ
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$67.91
Change+$0.80 (+1.19%)
Volume$6.35K
Net Assets1.52B
Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF
Price$114.67
Change+$0.73 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.59M
LIT vs PYZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. PYZ commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a StrongBuy and PYZ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.52B vs. PYZ (78.6M). LIT has a higher annual dividend yield than PYZ: LIT (65.125) vs PYZ (32.219). LIT was incepted earlier than PYZ: LIT (15 years) vs PYZ (19 years). PYZ (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). PYZ has a higher turnover LIT (22.87) vs LIT (22.87).
| LIT | PYZ | LIT / PYZ | |
| Gain YTD | 65.125 | 32.219 | 202% |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 78.6M | 1,930% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.60 | 125% |
| Turnover | 22.87 | 69.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.83 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | PYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 88% | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JCVWX | 19.80 | 0.11 | +0.56% |
| JHancock Classic Value R6 | |||
| AUENX | 17.89 | 0.06 | +0.34% |
| AQR Large Cap Defensive Style N | |||
| PMVEX | 27.89 | 0.06 | +0.22% |
| PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val R2 | |||
| EAMAX | 20.29 | 0.04 | +0.20% |
| Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Equity A | |||
| COSSX | 14.19 | -0.02 | -0.14% |
| Columbia Overseas Value Inst2 | |||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||
PYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PYZ has been closely correlated with MTUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PYZ jumps, then MTUS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYZ | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| MTUS - PYZ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| ASIX - PYZ | 74% Closely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| ZEUS - PYZ | 71% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| PPG - PYZ | 70% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| ESI - PYZ | 69% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
More | ||||