Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs PICK
LIT vs PICK Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs PICK
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$70.25
Change-$1.70 (-2.36%)
Volume$356
Net Assets1.67B
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
Price$59.35
Change-$1.65 (-2.70%)
Volume$1.19K
Net Assets1.82B
LIT vs PICK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. PICK commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a Hold and PICK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PICK has more net assets: 1.82B vs. LIT (1.67B). PICK has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: PICK (18.816) vs LIT (10.931). LIT was incepted earlier than PICK: LIT (16 years) vs PICK (14 years). PICK (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT has a higher turnover PICK (10.00) vs PICK (10.00).
| LIT | PICK | LIT / PICK | |
| Gain YTD | 10.931 | 18.816 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 1.82B | 92% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.39 | 192% |
| Turnover | 51.63 | 10.00 | 516% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 2.54 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 28 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +2.61% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 71% Closely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +11.35% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 50% Loosely correlated | +6.75% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||
PICK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PICK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICK | 100% | +4.60% | ||
| RIO - PICK | 82% Closely correlated | +4.16% | ||
| MT - PICK | 73% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| BHP - PICK | 71% Closely correlated | +4.83% | ||
| AA - PICK | 67% Closely correlated | +5.39% | ||
| CENX - PICK | 57% Loosely correlated | +6.74% | ||
More | ||||