Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIT vs PICK
LIT vs PICK Comparison
Open Charts LIT vs PICK
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$67.10
Change+$0.44 (+0.66%)
Volume$176.46K
Net Assets1.5B
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
Price$51.54
Change+$0.05 (+0.10%)
Volume$780.84K
Net Assets1.12B
LIT vs PICK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIT vs. PICK commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIT is a StrongBuy and PICK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.5B vs. PICK (1.12B). LIT has a higher annual dividend yield than PICK: LIT (65.125) vs PICK (50.106). LIT was incepted earlier than PICK: LIT (15 years) vs PICK (14 years). PICK (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT has a higher turnover PICK (10.00) vs PICK (10.00).
| LIT | PICK | LIT / PICK | |
| Gain YTD | 65.125 | 50.106 | 130% |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 1.12B | 134% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.39 | 192% |
| Turnover | 22.87 | 10.00 | 229% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 2.82 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 17 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||
PICK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PICK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICK | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| BHP - PICK | 87% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| RIO - PICK | 82% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| MT - PICK | 73% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| AA - PICK | 67% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| CENX - PICK | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
More | ||||