LIND
Price
$14.66
Change
+$0.18 (+1.24%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
793.35M
55 days until earnings call
TRNR
Price
$3.15
Change
-$0.47 (-12.98%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.83M
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIND vs TRNR

Header iconLIND vs TRNR Comparison
Open Charts LIND vs TRNRBanner chart's image
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings
Price$14.66
Change+$0.18 (+1.24%)
Volume$2.67K
Capitalization793.35M
Interactive Strength
Price$3.15
Change-$0.47 (-12.98%)
Volume$400
Capitalization5.83M
LIND vs TRNR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIND vs. TRNR commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIND is a Hold and TRNR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LIND: $14.48 vs. TRNR: $3.63)
Brand notoriety: LIND and TRNR are both not notable
LIND represents the Consumer Sundries, while TRNR is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIND: 72% vs. TRNR: 28%
Market capitalization -- LIND: $793.35M vs. TRNR: $5.83M
LIND [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $793.35M. TRNR’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $5.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $181.04B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.39B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRNR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRNR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRNR is a better buy in the long-term than LIND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIND’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRNR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRNR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRNR is a better buy in the short-term than LIND.

Price Growth

LIND (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -2.36% price change this week, while TRNR (@Personnel Services) price change was -7.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +7.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.71%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -4.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIND is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

TRNR is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+7.07% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (-4.46% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIND($793M) has a higher market cap than TRNR($5.83M). LIND YTD gains are higher at: 22.091 vs. TRNR (-87.281). LIND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 96.1M vs. TRNR (-8.49M). LIND has more cash in the bank: 201M vs. TRNR (582K). TRNR has less debt than LIND: TRNR (55.4M) vs LIND (628M). LIND has higher revenues than TRNR: LIND (702M) vs TRNR (6.97M).
LINDTRNRLIND / TRNR
Capitalization793M5.83M13,614%
EBITDA96.1M-8.49M-1,132%
Gain YTD22.091-87.281-25%
P/E RatioN/A0.01-
Revenue702M6.97M10,069%
Total Cash201M582K34,536%
Total Debt628M55.4M1,134%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIND: Fundamental Ratings
LIND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINDTRNR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RUNTX26.630.43
+1.64%
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity M
TSMNX16.560.23
+1.41%
Nuveen Quant Small/Mid Cap Eq I
SRIAX14.140.16
+1.14%
Gabelli SRI A
MKVFX16.630.11
+0.67%
MFS International Large Cap Value R3
SREQX13.460.08
+0.60%
PGIM Select Real Estate R6

LIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIND
1D Price
Change %
LIND100%
+1.37%
CUK - LIND
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
CCL - LIND
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
NCLH - LIND
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
RCL - LIND
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
VIK - LIND
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
More

TRNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRNR and GDDFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRNR and GDDFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRNR
1D Price
Change %
TRNR100%
+6.93%
GDDFF - TRNR
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YYGH - TRNR
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
CCL - TRNR
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
ROL - TRNR
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
LIND - TRNR
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More