LIND
Price
$12.95
Change
+$0.08 (+0.62%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
709.52M
31 days until earnings call
TNL
Price
$60.35
Change
+$0.71 (+1.19%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.92B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIND vs TNL

Header iconLIND vs TNL Comparison
Open Charts LIND vs TNLBanner chart's image
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings
Price$12.95
Change+$0.08 (+0.62%)
Volume$272.34K
Capitalization709.52M
Travel + Leisure
Price$60.35
Change+$0.71 (+1.19%)
Volume$432.84K
Capitalization3.92B
LIND vs TNL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIND vs. TNL commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIND is a Buy and TNL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LIND: $12.95 vs. TNL: $60.35)
Brand notoriety: LIND and TNL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIND: 66% vs. TNL: 61%
Market capitalization -- LIND: $709.52M vs. TNL: $3.92B
LIND [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $709.52M. TNL’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $3.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $179.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTNL’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TNL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNL is a better buy in the long-term than LIND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIND’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • TNL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TNL is a better buy in the short-term than LIND.

Price Growth

LIND (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -0.23% price change this week, while TNL (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +41.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIND is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

TNL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (-0.31% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNL($3.92B) has a higher market cap than LIND($710M). TNL YTD gains are higher at: 23.494 vs. LIND (9.191). LIND has less debt than TNL: LIND (628M) vs TNL (5.59B).
LINDTNLLIND / TNL
Capitalization710M3.92B18%
EBITDA96.1MN/A-
Gain YTD9.19123.49439%
P/E RatioN/A10.50-
Revenue702MN/A-
Total Cash201MN/A-
Total Debt628M5.59B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIND vs TNL: Fundamental Ratings
LIND
TNL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7079
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8333
SMR RATING
1..100
1003
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9724
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TNL's Valuation (19) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (88) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIND (83) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's SMR Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (49) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINDTNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLECX21.710.21
+0.98%
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity C
FITGX22.640.20
+0.89%
Fidelity Advisor International Growth M
TVFRX18.470.08
+0.44%
NAA Allocation P
CLTIX16.960.06
+0.36%
Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation I
TEMRX9.85-0.10
-1.01%
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq A

LIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIND
1D Price
Change %
LIND100%
+0.62%
CUK - LIND
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
CCL - LIND
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
NCLH - LIND
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
RCL - LIND
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
TNL - LIND
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
More

TNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNL has been closely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNL jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNL
1D Price
Change %
TNL100%
+1.19%
CUK - TNL
71%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
CCL - TNL
71%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
VIK - TNL
70%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
RCL - TNL
69%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
NCLH - TNL
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
More