LIND
Price
$14.29
Change
-$0.05 (-0.35%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
782.66M
56 days until earnings call
NCLH
Price
$25.34
Change
+$0.62 (+2.51%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.45B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIND vs NCLH

Header iconLIND vs NCLH Comparison
Open Charts LIND vs NCLHBanner chart's image
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings
Price$14.29
Change-$0.05 (-0.35%)
Volume$330.61K
Capitalization782.66M
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings
Price$25.34
Change+$0.62 (+2.51%)
Volume$16.68M
Capitalization11.45B
LIND vs NCLH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIND vs. NCLH commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIND is a Buy and NCLH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LIND: $14.33 vs. NCLH: $24.72)
Brand notoriety: LIND and NCLH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIND: 107% vs. NCLH: 91%
Market capitalization -- LIND: $782.66M vs. NCLH: $11.45B
LIND [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $782.66M. NCLH’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $11.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $180.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNCLH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NCLH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NCLH is a better buy in the long-term than LIND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIND’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCLH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NCLH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIND is a better buy in the short-term than NCLH.

Price Growth

LIND (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -2.38% price change this week, while NCLH (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIND is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

NCLH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+3.35% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NCLH($11.5B) has a higher market cap than LIND($783M). LIND YTD gains are higher at: 20.826 vs. NCLH (-3.925). NCLH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.38B vs. LIND (96.1M). LIND has more cash in the bank: 201M vs. NCLH (184M). LIND has less debt than NCLH: LIND (628M) vs NCLH (13.8B). NCLH has higher revenues than LIND: NCLH (9.56B) vs LIND (702M).
LINDNCLHLIND / NCLH
Capitalization783M11.5B7%
EBITDA96.1M2.38B4%
Gain YTD20.826-3.925-531%
P/E RatioN/A17.36-
Revenue702M9.56B7%
Total Cash201M184M109%
Total Debt628M13.8B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIND vs NCLH: Fundamental Ratings
LIND
NCLH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2260
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6866
SMR RATING
1..100
10017
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
398
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9758
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NCLH's Valuation (83) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (88) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that NCLH’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

NCLH's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (68) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that NCLH’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

NCLH's SMR Rating (17) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that NCLH’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

NCLH's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as LIND (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that NCLH’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

NCLH's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIND (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that NCLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINDNCLH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PXH24.400.01
+0.03%
Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF
PGZ10.49-0.02
-0.19%
PRINCIPAL REAL ESTATE Income FUND
USVN48.42-0.13
-0.27%
F/m US Treasury 7 Year Note ETF
EQIN45.79-0.15
-0.33%
Columbia US Equity Income ETF
METV19.12-0.07
-0.36%
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF

LIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIND
1D Price
Change %
LIND100%
-1.71%
CUK - LIND
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.41%
CCL - LIND
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
NCLH - LIND
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
RCL - LIND
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
VIK - LIND
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More

NCLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCLH has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NCLH jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCLH
1D Price
Change %
NCLH100%
-0.48%
CCL - NCLH
88%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
CUK - NCLH
87%
Closely correlated
-2.41%
RCL - NCLH
79%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
VIK - NCLH
71%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
TNL - NCLH
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
More