LIND
Price
$12.87
Change
-$0.13 (-1.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
705.14M
34 days until earnings call
MED
Price
$13.65
Change
-$0.18 (-1.30%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
150.03M
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIND vs MED

Header iconLIND vs MED Comparison
Open Charts LIND vs MEDBanner chart's image
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings
Price$12.87
Change-$0.13 (-1.00%)
Volume$229.55K
Capitalization705.14M
Medifast
Price$13.65
Change-$0.18 (-1.30%)
Volume$134.08K
Capitalization150.03M
LIND vs MED Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIND vs. MED commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIND is a Buy and MED is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LIND: $12.87 vs. MED: $13.63)
Brand notoriety: LIND and MED are both not notable
LIND represents the Consumer Sundries, while MED is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIND: 22% vs. MED: 25%
Market capitalization -- LIND: $705.14M vs. MED: $150.03M
LIND [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $705.14M. MED’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $150.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $180.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.12B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMED’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MED is a better buy in the long-term than LIND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIND’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MED’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MED is a better buy in the short-term than LIND.

Price Growth

LIND (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -2.05% price change this week, while MED (@Personnel Services) price change was -6.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.13%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIND is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

MED is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (-0.68% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (-2.02% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIND($705M) has a higher market cap than MED($150M). LIND YTD gains are higher at: 8.516 vs. MED (-22.645). LIND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 96.1M vs. MED (14.2M). LIND has more cash in the bank: 201M vs. MED (163M). MED has less debt than LIND: MED (13.1M) vs LIND (628M). LIND has higher revenues than MED: LIND (702M) vs MED (480M).
LINDMEDLIND / MED
Capitalization705M150M470%
EBITDA96.1M14.2M677%
Gain YTD8.516-22.645-38%
P/E RatioN/A41.36-
Revenue702M480M146%
Total Cash201M163M123%
Total Debt628M13.1M4,794%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIND vs MED: Fundamental Ratings
LIND
MED
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
664
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
973
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MED's Valuation (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (88) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

LIND's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MED (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to MED’s over the last 12 months.

MED's SMR Rating (91) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LIND (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

LIND's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MED (60) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to MED’s over the last 12 months.

MED's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINDMED
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GAAEX6.20N/A
N/A
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy
FIGFX23.33N/A
N/A
Fidelity International Growth
ADGCX17.25N/A
N/A
AB Core Opportunities C
FOSCX29.85N/A
N/A
Tributary Small Company Instl
TAAEX48.75N/A
N/A
Transamerica Capital Growth R

LIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIND
1D Price
Change %
LIND100%
-1.00%
CUK - LIND
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCL - LIND
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
NCLH - LIND
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
RCL - LIND
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
VIK - LIND
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
More

MED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MED and FTDR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MED and FTDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MED
1D Price
Change %
MED100%
-1.45%
FTDR - MED
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
TNL - MED
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
MCW - MED
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
SCI - MED
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
LIND - MED
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
More