LIND
Price
$14.33
Change
-$0.25 (-1.71%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
798.83M
58 days until earnings call
MED
Price
$13.95
Change
-$0.09 (-0.64%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
154.2M
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIND vs MED

Header iconLIND vs MED Comparison
Open Charts LIND vs MEDBanner chart's image
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings
Price$14.33
Change-$0.25 (-1.71%)
Volume$13.24K
Capitalization798.83M
Medifast
Price$13.95
Change-$0.09 (-0.64%)
Volume$700
Capitalization154.2M
LIND vs MED Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIND vs. MED commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIND is a Buy and MED is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (LIND: $14.58 vs. MED: $14.03)
Brand notoriety: LIND and MED are both not notable
LIND represents the Consumer Sundries, while MED is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIND: 91% vs. MED: 60%
Market capitalization -- LIND: $798.83M vs. MED: $154.2M
LIND [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $798.83M. MED’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $154.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $181.46B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMED’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MED is a better buy in the long-term than LIND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIND’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MED’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MED’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MED is a better buy in the short-term than LIND.

Price Growth

LIND (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -1.75% price change this week, while MED (@Personnel Services) price change was -1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIND is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

MED is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+0.86% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (-1.34% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIND($799M) has a higher market cap than MED($154M). LIND YTD gains are higher at: 22.934 vs. MED (-20.375). LIND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 96.1M vs. MED (14.2M). LIND has more cash in the bank: 201M vs. MED (163M). MED has less debt than LIND: MED (13.1M) vs LIND (628M). LIND has higher revenues than MED: LIND (702M) vs MED (480M).
LINDMEDLIND / MED
Capitalization799M154M519%
EBITDA96.1M14.2M677%
Gain YTD22.934-20.375-113%
P/E RatioN/A42.52-
Revenue702M480M146%
Total Cash201M163M123%
Total Debt628M13.1M4,794%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIND vs MED: Fundamental Ratings
LIND
MED
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
10090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
973
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MED's Valuation (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (88) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

LIND's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MED (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew somewhat faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

MED's SMR Rating (90) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LIND (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.

LIND's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MED (61) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to MED’s over the last 12 months.

MED's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINDMED
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFGEX10.980.04
+0.37%
DFA Global Real Estate Securities Port
MISEX39.340.12
+0.31%
Midas Special Opportunities
IASTX24.30-0.10
-0.41%
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl R6
SCRUX11.68-0.05
-0.43%
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund R
AVEEX13.94-0.07
-0.50%
Avantis® Emerging Markets Equity Instl

LIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIND
1D Price
Change %
LIND100%
-1.69%
CUK - LIND
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
CCL - LIND
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
NCLH - LIND
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
RCL - LIND
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
VIK - LIND
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More

MED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MED and FTDR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MED and FTDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MED
1D Price
Change %
MED100%
+0.07%
FTDR - MED
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
TNL - MED
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
MCW - MED
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
SCI - MED
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
LIND - MED
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
More