LINC
Price
$16.09
Change
-$1.54 (-8.74%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
325.22M
8 days until earnings call
PHLT
Price
$2.37
Change
+$0.03 (+1.28%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
205.38M
23 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LINC vs PHLT

Header iconLINC vs PHLT Comparison
Open Charts LINC vs PHLTBanner chart's image
Lincoln Educational Services
Price$16.09
Change-$1.54 (-8.74%)
Volume$229.61K
Capitalization325.22M
Performant Healthcare
Price$2.37
Change+$0.03 (+1.28%)
Volume$317.78K
Capitalization205.38M
LINC vs PHLT Comparison Chart
Loading...
LINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LINC vs. PHLT commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LINC is a Hold and PHLT is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (LINC: $17.88)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LINC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • LINC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LINC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHLT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LINC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PHLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PHLT is a better buy in the short-term than LINC.

Price Growth

LINC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +2.23% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +92.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

LINC is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.23% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LINC($325M) has a higher market cap than PHLT($205M). LINC YTD gains are higher at: 13.021 vs. PHLT (-22.185). LINC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 42.6M vs. PHLT (828K). LINC has more cash in the bank: 76M vs. PHLT (7.25M). PHLT has less debt than LINC: PHLT (5.55M) vs LINC (117M). LINC has higher revenues than PHLT: LINC (378M) vs PHLT (114M).
LINCPHLTLINC / PHLT
Capitalization325M205M159%
EBITDA42.6M828K5,145%
Gain YTD13.021-22.185-59%
P/E Ratio12.05N/A-
Revenue378M114M332%
Total Cash76M7.25M1,048%
Total Debt117M5.55M2,110%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LINC vs PHLT: Fundamental Ratings
LINC
PHLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
239
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
363
SMR RATING
1..100
8193
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3864
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
284
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PHLT's Valuation (57) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (85). This means that PHLT’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHLT (63). This means that LINC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHLT’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's SMR Rating (81) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as PHLT (93). This means that LINC’s stock grew similarly to PHLT’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as PHLT (64). This means that LINC’s stock grew similarly to PHLT’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for PHLT (84). This means that LINC’s stock grew significantly faster than PHLT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINCPHLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

LINC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LINC has been loosely correlated with UTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LINC jumps, then UTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LINC
1D Price
Change %
LINC100%
+1.71%
UTI - LINC
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FC - LINC
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ATGE - LINC
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.36%
LOPE - LINC
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
APEI - LINC
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
More

PHLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHLT has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHLT jumps, then FC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHLT
1D Price
Change %
PHLT100%
+1.51%
FC - PHLT
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LINC - PHLT
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
FORR - PHLT
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.78%
ICFI - PHLT
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.42%
PRSU - PHLT
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
More