Advertisement
LINC vs PHLT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LINC is a Hold and PHLT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LINC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePHLT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LINC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PHLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LINC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHLT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LINC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PHLT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LINC (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +3.08% price change this week, while PHLT (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -0.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.10%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
LINC is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
PHLT is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (+1.64% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
@Services to the Health Industry (+2.00% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| LINC | PHLT | LINC / PHLT | |
| Capitalization | 750M | 602M | 125% |
| EBITDA | 32.6M | 1.95M | 1,676% |
| Gain YTD | 50.126 | 152.318 | 33% |
| P/E Ratio | 60.90 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 454M | 129M | 352% |
| Total Cash | 28.7M | 9.98M | 288% |
| Total Debt | 176M | 8.89M | 1,981% |
LINC | PHLT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PHLT's Valuation (71) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (93). This means that PHLT’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.
LINC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as PHLT (18). This means that LINC’s stock grew similarly to PHLT’s over the last 12 months.
LINC's SMR Rating (79) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as PHLT (94). This means that LINC’s stock grew similarly to PHLT’s over the last 12 months.
PHLT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (40). This means that PHLT’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.
LINC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for PHLT (83). This means that LINC’s stock grew significantly faster than PHLT’s over the last 12 months.
| LINC | PHLT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 11 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 74% | 13 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 88% |
Advertisement
LINC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LINC has been loosely correlated with UTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LINC jumps, then UTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LINC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINC | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| UTI - LINC | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| ATGE - LINC | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| PRDO - LINC | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| GHC - LINC | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| AZZ - LINC | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
More | ||||
PHLT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHLT has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHLT jumps, then FC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHLT | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| FC - PHLT | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| LINC - PHLT | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| FORR - PHLT | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| ICFI - PHLT | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.79% | ||
| PRSU - PHLT | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||