LIN
Price
$412.54
Change
+$9.24 (+2.29%)
Updated
Dec 12, 11:59 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
188.32B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VBVBF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
1.48B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIN vs VBVBF

Header iconLIN vs VBVBF Comparison
Open Charts LIN vs VBVBFBanner chart's image
Linde
Price$412.54
Change+$9.24 (+2.29%)
Volume$13.43K
Capitalization188.32B
VERBIO SE
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.48B
LIN vs VBVBF Comparison Chart in %
LIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VBVBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIN vs. VBVBF commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIN is a StrongBuy and VBVBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (LIN: $403.30 vs. VBVBF: $16.90)
Brand notoriety: LIN and VBVBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIN: 123% vs. VBVBF: 55%
Market capitalization -- LIN: $188.32B vs. VBVBF: $1.48B
LIN [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $188.32B. VBVBF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $188.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVBVBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VBVBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LIN and VBVBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VBVBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VBVBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIN is a better buy in the short-term than VBVBF.

Price Growth

LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -0.11% price change this week, while VBVBF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.05% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIN($188B) has a higher market cap than VBVBF($1.48B). VBVBF has higher P/E ratio than LIN: VBVBF (48.62) vs LIN (26.99). VBVBF YTD gains are higher at: 49.558 vs. LIN (-2.732). LIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.1B vs. VBVBF (63.5M). LIN has more cash in the bank: 4.79B vs. VBVBF (85.3M). VBVBF has less debt than LIN: VBVBF (263M) vs LIN (25.9B). LIN has higher revenues than VBVBF: LIN (33.2B) vs VBVBF (1.49B).
LINVBVBFLIN / VBVBF
Capitalization188B1.48B12,686%
EBITDA13.1B63.5M20,630%
Gain YTD-2.73249.558-6%
P/E Ratio26.9948.6256%
Revenue33.2B1.49B2,234%
Total Cash4.79B85.3M5,611%
Total Debt25.9B263M9,848%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIN vs VBVBF: Fundamental Ratings
LIN
VBVBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1242
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2789
SMR RATING
1..100
4992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
718
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VBVBF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LIN (76) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that VBVBF’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VBVBF (89) in the null industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than VBVBF’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's SMR Rating (49) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VBVBF (92) in the null industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than VBVBF’s over the last 12 months.

VBVBF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as LIN (64) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that VBVBF’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.

VBVBF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (71) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that VBVBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINVBVBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VBVBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLV57.621.55
+2.76%
iShares Silver Trust
HYXF47.240.03
+0.06%
iShares ESG Advanced Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF
BBSB99.240.04
+0.04%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. TrsBd1-3YrETF
BIT13.19N/A
N/A
BLACKROCK MULTI-SECTOR Income TRUST
BTC40.65-0.31
-0.76%
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF

LIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIN has been closely correlated with APD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIN jumps, then APD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIN
1D Price
Change %
LIN100%
+2.70%
APD - LIN
67%
Closely correlated
+2.97%
RPM - LIN
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
ECL - LIN
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
PPG - LIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
DD - LIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
More

VBVBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VBVBF has been closely correlated with VULC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VBVBF jumps, then VULC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VBVBF
1D Price
Change %
VBVBF100%
N/A
VULC - VBVBF
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
LIN - VBVBF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
LNXSY - VBVBF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
GNENY - VBVBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
PTPIF - VBVBF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More