LIN
Price
$476.59
Change
+$13.02 (+2.81%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
216.46B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VBVBF
Price
$14.38
Change
+$2.28 (+18.84%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIN vs VBVBF

Header iconLIN vs VBVBF Comparison
Open Charts LIN vs VBVBFBanner chart's image
Linde
Price$476.59
Change+$13.02 (+2.81%)
Volume$812
Capitalization216.46B
VERBIO SE
Price$14.38
Change+$2.28 (+18.84%)
Volume$445
Capitalization1.86B
LIN vs VBVBF Comparison Chart in %
LIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIN vs. VBVBF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIN is a Hold and VBVBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (LIN: $463.57 vs. VBVBF: $16.90)
Brand notoriety: LIN and VBVBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIN: 106% vs. VBVBF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LIN: $216.46B vs. VBVBF: $1.86B
LIN [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $216.46B. VBVBF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $1.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $216.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVBVBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VBVBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIN is a better buy in the long-term than VBVBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +2.33% price change this week, while VBVBF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.59% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIN($216B) has a higher market cap than VBVBF($1.86B). VBVBF has higher P/E ratio than LIN: VBVBF (48.62) vs LIN (31.03). LIN YTD gains are higher at: 8.720 vs. VBVBF (0.000). LIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.3B vs. VBVBF (37.5M). LIN has more cash in the bank: 4.51B vs. VBVBF (72.4M). VBVBF has less debt than LIN: VBVBF (297M) vs LIN (25.9B). LIN has higher revenues than VBVBF: LIN (33.5B) vs VBVBF (1.66B).
LINVBVBFLIN / VBVBF
Capitalization216B1.86B11,588%
EBITDA13.3B37.5M35,467%
Gain YTD8.7200.000-
P/E Ratio31.0348.6264%
Revenue33.5B1.66B2,018%
Total Cash4.51B72.4M6,228%
Total Debt25.9B297M8,721%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIN vs VBVBF: Fundamental Ratings
LIN
VBVBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1739
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21100
SMR RATING
1..100
4895
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6210
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6530

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VBVBF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as LIN (81) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that VBVBF’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for VBVBF (100) in the null industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew significantly faster than VBVBF’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's SMR Rating (48) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VBVBF (95) in the null industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than VBVBF’s over the last 12 months.

VBVBF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as LIN (52) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that VBVBF’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.

VBVBF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (62) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that VBVBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINVBVBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
47%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUKZ70.581.46
+2.11%
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
VBF15.390.01
+0.07%
INVESCO
PUTD21.67N/A
N/A
Cboe Validus S&P 500 Dynamic PutWrite Index ETF
LCDS66.96N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Sci Lg Cor ETF
XLF53.53-0.50
-0.93%
State Street®FinSelSectSPDR®ETF

LIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIN has been loosely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIN jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIN
1D Price
Change %
LIN100%
+0.74%
RPM - LIN
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.25%
APD - LIN
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
DD - LIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
ECL - LIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
PPG - LIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.63%
More

VBVBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VBVBF has been closely correlated with VULC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VBVBF jumps, then VULC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VBVBF
1D Price
Change %
VBVBF100%
N/A
VULC - VBVBF
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
LIN - VBVBF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
LNXSY - VBVBF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNENY - VBVBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
PTPIF - VBVBF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More