LILIF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
NWXPF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.05 (+125.00%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
12.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LILIF vs NWXPF

Header iconLILIF vs NWXPF Comparison
Open Charts LILIF vs NWXPFBanner chart's image
Argentina Lithium & Energy
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$53.39K
CapitalizationN/A
Newport Exploration
Price$0.09
Change+$0.05 (+125.00%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization12.89M
LILIF vs NWXPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LILIF vs. NWXPF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LILIF is a Hold and NWXPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LILIF: $0.04 vs. NWXPF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: LILIF and NWXPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LILIF: 83% vs. NWXPF: 91%
Market capitalization -- LILIF: $0 vs. NWXPF: $12.89M
LILIF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $0. NWXPF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $12.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LILIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWXPF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LILIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NWXPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWXPF is a better buy in the long-term than LILIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LILIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWXPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LILIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NWXPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWXPF is a better buy in the short-term than LILIF.

Price Growth

LILIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.39% price change this week, while NWXPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWXPF YTD gains are higher at: 83.617 vs. LILIF (-45.250).
LILIFNWXPFLILIF / NWXPF
CapitalizationN/A12.9M-
EBITDAN/A3.4M-
Gain YTD-45.25083.617-54%
P/E RatioN/A6.76-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A1.53M-
Total DebtN/A93.3K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LILIF vs NWXPF: Fundamental Ratings
LILIF
NWXPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9733
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8934
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWXPF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as LILIF (23). This means that NWXPF’s stock grew similarly to LILIF’s over the last 12 months.

NWXPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LILIF (100). This means that NWXPF’s stock grew similarly to LILIF’s over the last 12 months.

NWXPF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LILIF (97). This means that NWXPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LILIF’s over the last 12 months.

NWXPF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LILIF (89). This means that NWXPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LILIF’s over the last 12 months.

NWXPF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LILIF (100). This means that NWXPF’s stock grew significantly faster than LILIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LILIFNWXPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVNZF0.46N/A
N/A
Comvita New Zealand Ltd.
SBMFF0.68N/A
N/A
Sino Biopharmaceutical Ltd.
HBRIY2.63N/A
N/A
Harbour Energy Plc
FMOO64.80N/A
N/A
F&M Bancorp
BTRMF0.03-0.04
-54.86%
Battery Mineral Resources Corp.

LILIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LILIF and PRZFF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LILIF and PRZFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LILIF
1D Price
Change %
LILIF100%
+9.50%
PRZFF - LILIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTSRF - LILIF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
MALRY - LILIF
23%
Poorly correlated
+7.44%
CUAUF - LILIF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWMCF - LILIF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NWXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWXPF has been loosely correlated with SLROF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWXPF jumps, then SLROF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWXPF
1D Price
Change %
NWXPF100%
N/A
SLROF - NWXPF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MMTLF - NWXPF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.67%
SIERF - NWXPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ULTHF - NWXPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
LILIF - NWXPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.50%
More