It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LILA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LILA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USM’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
LILA (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -20.75% price change this week, while USM (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -4.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +9.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.43%.
LILA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
USM is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
LILA | USM | LILA / USM | |
Capitalization | 1.44B | 3.05B | 47% |
EBITDA | 1.55B | 963M | 161% |
Gain YTD | -10.670 | 48.339 | -22% |
P/E Ratio | 8.18 | 56.97 | 14% |
Revenue | 4.51B | 3.91B | 115% |
Total Cash | 989M | 150M | 659% |
Total Debt | 8.26B | 4.03B | 205% |
LILA | USM | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LILA's Valuation (63) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as USM (84) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that LILA’s stock grew similarly to USM’s over the last 12 months.
USM's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LILA (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that USM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LILA’s over the last 12 months.
USM's SMR Rating (89) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LILA (91) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that USM’s stock grew similarly to LILA’s over the last 12 months.
USM's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LILA (89) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that USM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LILA’s over the last 12 months.
LILA's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as USM (99) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that LILA’s stock grew similarly to USM’s over the last 12 months.
LILA | USM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago0% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago61% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LILA has been closely correlated with LILAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LILA jumps, then LILAK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LILA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LILA | 100% | -0.91% | ||
LILAK - LILA | 100% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
CHTR - LILA | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
SHEN - LILA | 35% Loosely correlated | +3.80% | ||
LBRDK - LILA | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
LBRDA - LILA | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USM has been closely correlated with TDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USM jumps, then TDS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
USM | 100% | -0.52% | ||
TDS - USM | 87% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
LBTYA - USM | 28% Poorly correlated | +4.62% | ||
FYBR - USM | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
LILA - USM | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
LILAK - USM | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
More |