LII
Price
$500.35
Change
+$13.06 (+2.68%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.17B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OC
Price
$114.11
Change
+$1.61 (+1.43%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.35B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LII vs OC

Header iconLII vs OC Comparison
Open Charts LII vs OCBanner chart's image
Lennox International
Price$500.35
Change+$13.06 (+2.68%)
Volume$6.64K
Capitalization17.17B
Owens Corning
Price$114.11
Change+$1.61 (+1.43%)
Volume$14.56K
Capitalization9.35B
LII vs OC Comparison Chart in %
LII
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LII vs. OC commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LII is a StrongBuy and OC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LII: $487.19 vs. OC: $112.49)
Brand notoriety: LII: Not notable vs. OC: Notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LII: 34% vs. OC: 26%
Market capitalization -- LII: $17.17B vs. OC: $9.35B
LII [@Building Products] is valued at $17.17B. OC’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $9.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $90.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LII’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LII is a better buy in the long-term than OC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LII’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LII’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LII is a better buy in the short-term than OC.

Price Growth

LII (@Building Products) experienced а +0.63% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was +2.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

LII is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

OC is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+1.35% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LII($17.2B) has a higher market cap than OC($9.35B). LII has higher P/E ratio than OC: LII (20.68) vs OC (15.02). LII YTD gains are higher at: -19.484 vs. OC (-32.674). OC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.96B vs. LII (1.16B). LII has less debt than OC: LII (1.55B) vs OC (5.98B). OC has higher revenues than LII: OC (11.7B) vs LII (5.42B).
LIIOCLII / OC
Capitalization17.2B9.35B184%
EBITDA1.16B1.96B59%
Gain YTD-19.484-32.67460%
P/E Ratio20.6815.02138%
Revenue5.42B11.7B46%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.55B5.98B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LII vs OC: Fundamental Ratings
LII
OC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4568
SMR RATING
1..100
1381
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6283
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8345
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5016

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OC's Valuation (32) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LII (81) in the Building Products industry. This means that OC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LII’s over the last 12 months.

LII's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as OC (68) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that LII’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

LII's SMR Rating (13) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for OC (81) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that LII’s stock grew significantly faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

LII's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as OC (83) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that LII’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

OC's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LII (83) in the Building Products industry. This means that OC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LII’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIIOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LII
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XDAT26.420.44
+1.69%
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
SPXE73.780.26
+0.36%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Energy
HEQQ58.590.20
+0.35%
JPMorgan Nasdaq Hdg Eq Ldrd Overlay ETF
FTHI23.690.05
+0.21%
First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF
IDLV33.820.03
+0.09%
Invesco S&P Intl Dev Low Vol ETF

LII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LII has been closely correlated with CARR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LII jumps, then CARR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LII
1D Price
Change %
LII100%
-0.46%
CARR - LII
70%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
MAS - LII
66%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
FBIN - LII
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
IR - LII
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OC - LII
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
More

OC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OC jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OC
1D Price
Change %
OC100%
-1.06%
FBIN - OC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
LII - OC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
LPX - OC
72%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
TREX - OC
72%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
MAS - OC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
More