Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIFLX vs RMFCX
LIFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LIFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value I
Price$15.71
Change+$0.13 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.62M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LIFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LIFLX (58.6M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LIFLX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LIFLX (0.77). LIFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LIFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LIFLX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LIFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LIFLX: RMFCX (250) vs LIFLX (1000000). LIFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.03 vs. RMFCX (7.71). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. LIFLX (16.46).
| LIFLX | RMFCX | LIFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.91 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.568 | 11.421 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.24 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.03 | 7.71 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.74 | 32.16 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.46 | 56.41 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement