Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIFLX vs RMEBX
LIFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LIFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value I
Price$15.71
Change+$0.13 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.62M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LIFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LIFLX (58.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LIFLX: RMEBX (1.09) vs LIFLX (0.77). LIFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LIFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LIFLX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LIFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LIFLX: RMEBX (250) vs LIFLX (1000000). LIFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.03 vs. RMEBX (7.57). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. LIFLX (16.46).
| LIFLX | RMEBX | LIFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.07 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.568 | 11.308 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.03 | 7.57 | 238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.74 | 31.59 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.46 | 55.29 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement