Advertisement
LIF vs TTAN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIF is a Hold and TTAN is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TTAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LIF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TTAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LIF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.01% price change this week, while TTAN (@Packaged Software) price change was -26.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -7.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +165.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
LIF is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2026.
TTAN is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-7.06% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| LIF | TTAN | LIF / TTAN | |
| Capitalization | 4.79B | 6.32B | 76% |
| EBITDA | 28.5M | -126.62M | -23% |
| Gain YTD | -4.786 | -36.610 | 13% |
| P/E Ratio | 165.08 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 459M | 916M | 50% |
| Total Cash | 456M | 493M | 92% |
| Total Debt | 310M | 158M | 196% |
| LIF | TTAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FEAMX | 15.85 | 0.10 | +0.63% |
| First Eagle Rising Dividend Fund C | |||
| FEDDX | 20.77 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery | |||
| TQGIX | 21.99 | -0.06 | -0.27% |
| T. Rowe Price Integrated Global Eq I | |||
| FINFX | 94.61 | -1.15 | -1.20% |
| American Funds Fundamental Invs F2 | |||
| CMTFX | 110.86 | -2.90 | -2.55% |
| Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst | |||
LIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIF has been loosely correlated with AEYE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIF jumps, then AEYE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIF | 100% | +5.57% | ||
| AEYE - LIF | 47% Loosely correlated | -7.06% | ||
| FRSH - LIF | 40% Loosely correlated | -10.60% | ||
| TTAN - LIF | 40% Loosely correlated | -9.32% | ||
| DOCU - LIF | 39% Loosely correlated | -11.40% | ||
| INTA - LIF | 38% Loosely correlated | -12.87% | ||
More | ||||
TTAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAN has been loosely correlated with GWRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTAN jumps, then GWRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAN | 100% | -9.32% | ||
| GWRE - TTAN | 54% Loosely correlated | -6.67% | ||
| DOCU - TTAN | 53% Loosely correlated | -11.40% | ||
| TEAM - TTAN | 52% Loosely correlated | -7.65% | ||
| HUBS - TTAN | 52% Loosely correlated | -10.55% | ||
| BRZE - TTAN | 51% Loosely correlated | -8.73% | ||
More | ||||