Advertisement
LIF vs QXO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIF is a Hold and QXO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQXO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QXO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QXO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QXO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LIF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -14.33% price change this week, while QXO (@Electronics Distributors) price change was -4.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +208.23%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was -2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
LIF is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
QXO is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.05% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Electronics Distributors (-2.11% weekly)Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.
| LIF | QXO | LIF / QXO | |
| Capitalization | 7.14B | 12.8B | 56% |
| EBITDA | 16.3M | -38.71M | -42% |
| Gain YTD | 123.213 | 19.057 | 647% |
| P/E Ratio | 242.42 | 2.01 | 12,063% |
| Revenue | 427M | 1.95B | 22% |
| Total Cash | 433M | 2.28B | 19% |
| Total Debt | 309M | 4.12B | 8% |
QXO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LIF | QXO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 14 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IJUN | 28.53 | 0.08 | +0.27% |
| Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Jun | |||
| IWL | 165.02 | -0.93 | -0.56% |
| iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | |||
| PXJ | 26.14 | -0.15 | -0.58% |
| Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF | |||
| NIM | 9.21 | -0.15 | -1.60% |
| Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund | |||
| KBWD | 13.26 | -0.31 | -2.25% |
| Invesco KBW High Dividend Yld Fincl ETF | |||
LIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIF has been loosely correlated with INTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIF jumps, then INTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIF | 100% | -5.88% | ||
| INTA - LIF | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.64% | ||
| PAR - LIF | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| PLUS - LIF | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| BRZE - LIF | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| PCOR - LIF | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.93% | ||
More | ||||
QXO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QXO has been loosely correlated with CYN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QXO jumps, then CYN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QXO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QXO | 100% | -2.77% | ||
| CYN - QXO | 40% Loosely correlated | -9.53% | ||
| MLGO - QXO | 36% Loosely correlated | -6.21% | ||
| TITN - QXO | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
| LIF - QXO | 31% Poorly correlated | -5.88% | ||
| WCC - QXO | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||