LIDR
Price
$1.13
Change
+$0.03 (+2.73%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
SANG
Price
$5.61
Change
+$0.14 (+2.56%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
39 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LIDR vs SANG

Header iconLIDR vs SANG Comparison
Open Charts LIDR vs SANGBanner chart's image
AEye
Price$1.13
Change+$0.03 (+2.73%)
Volume$63.15K
CapitalizationN/A
Sangoma Technologies
Price$5.61
Change+$0.14 (+2.56%)
Volume$22.34K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
LIDR vs SANG Comparison Chart
Loading...
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
LIDR vs. SANG commentary
Sep 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDR is a Hold and SANG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2024
Stock price -- (LIDR: $1.19 vs. SANG: $5.22)
Brand notoriety: LIDR and SANG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIDR: 18% vs. SANG: 40%
Market capitalization -- LIDR: $7.84M vs. SANG: $160.31M
LIDR [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.84M. SANG’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $160.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIDR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSANG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LIDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SANG is a better buy in the long-term than LIDR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIDR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LIDR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

LIDR (@Packaged Software) experienced а -10.53% price change this week, while SANG (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIDR is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2024.

SANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SANG($160M) has a higher market cap than LIDR($7.84M). SANG YTD gains are higher at: 63.125 vs. LIDR (-48.035). SANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.5M vs. LIDR (-81.44M). LIDR has more cash in the bank: 45.9M vs. SANG (10.6M). LIDR has less debt than SANG: LIDR (15.5M) vs SANG (105M). SANG has higher revenues than LIDR: SANG (252M) vs LIDR (2.49M).
LIDRSANGLIDR / SANG
Capitalization7.84M160M5%
EBITDA-81.44M17.5M-465%
Gain YTD-48.03563.125-76%
P/E RatioN/A909.09-
Revenue2.49M252M1%
Total Cash45.9M10.6M433%
Total Debt15.5M105M15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SANG: Fundamental Ratings
SANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIDR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

LIDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LIDR and GEN have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIDR and GEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIDR
1D Price
Change %
LIDR100%
-4.80%
GEN - LIDR
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
EGHT - LIDR
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.19%
SANG - LIDR
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
KC - LIDR
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.29%
GRVY - LIDR
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
More

SANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SANG and BKKT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SANG and BKKT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANG
1D Price
Change %
SANG100%
-1.69%
BKKT - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
-7.91%
OLB - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.63%
VS - SANG
25%
Poorly correlated
-21.05%
LIDR - SANG
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
ENV - SANG
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More